Once-weekly D-cycloserine effects on negative symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia: an exploratory study
Open accessAbstract
Background Daily dosing with D-cycloserine has inconsistently improved negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients, whereas intermittent dosing significantly facilitated exposure-based therapy in two studies of patients with phobic anxiety. In animal models, single dose administration enhances memory consolidation, but tachyphylaxis develops with repeated dosing. The objective of this exploratory study was to assess whether once-weekly dosing with D-cycloserine will produce persistent improvements in negative symptoms and cognition. Methods Fifty stable adult schizophrenia outpatients treated with any antipsychotic except clozapine were enrolled and 38 were randomized, double-blind, in a parallel-group, 8-week add-on trial of D-cycloserine 50 mg or placebo administered once-weekly. Symptom rating scales and a cognitive battery were administered at baseline and week 8 before the dose of study drug. As an exploratory analysis of memory consolidation, the Logical Memory Test, modified to measure recall after 7 days, was administered at baseline and after the first weekly dose of D-cycloserine. The primary outcome measures were change from baseline to week 8 on the SANS total score and on a composite cognitive score. Results Thirty-three subjects (87%) completed the trial. D-cycloserine significantly improved SANS total scores compared to placebo at week 8. Cognitive performance did not improve with D-cycloserine at 8 weeks. Delayed thematic recall on the Logical Memory Test was significantly improved with the first dose of D-cycloserine compared to placebo. Performance on immediate thematic recall and item recall on the Logical Memory Test did not differ between treatments. Conclusions Once-weekly dosing with D-cycloserine for 8 weeks produced persistent improvement of negative symptoms compared to placebo, although statistical significance was, in part, the result of worsening of negative symptoms with placebo. Consistent with animal models, a single dose of D-cycloserine facilitated memory consolidation tested after 7 days on a test of thematic recall. These results must be considered preliminary since a number of outcomes were examined without correction for multiple tests. These findings suggest that once-weekly dosing with D-cycloserine for the treatment of negative symptoms merits further study, as do D-cycloserine effects on memory consolidation.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In stable adult schizophrenia outpatients, once-weekly D-cycloserine 50 mg added to antipsychotics improved negative symptoms versus placebo over 8 weeks but did not improve composite cognition. A single first dose also improved 7-day delayed thematic recall, consistent with an effect on memory consolidation.
Key findings
- Modified SANS total score improved at week 8 with D-cycloserine versus placebo (p=0.048); response rates were 31.3% with D-cycloserine versus 11.8% with placebo but did not differ significantly (p>0.1). The net SANS reduction was 16.6% (effect size 0.7), reflecting 8% improvement with D-cycloserine and 8% worsening with placebo.
- Cognitive performance on the composite cognitive battery did not improve with D-cycloserine at 8 weeks.
- Delayed thematic recall on the Logical Memory Test at week 1, after the first dose, was significantly improved with D-cycloserine versus placebo (F(1,34)=6.77, p=.01, effect size 0.9); immediate thematic recall and immediate or delayed item recall did not differ.
- PANSS positive symptom subscale and CGI at week 8 did not differ between groups; D-cycloserine was generally well tolerated, with no dropouts directly attributed to its side effects.
Methods
- Fifty stable adult schizophrenia outpatients on any antipsychotic except clozapine were enrolled; 38 were randomized double-blind in a parallel-group, 8-week add-on trial of once-weekly D-cycloserine 50 mg or placebo, and 33 (87%) completed.
- Symptom scales (SANS, PANSS, CGI, SAFTEE) and a six-domain cognitive battery were administered at baseline and week 8 before study drug; a modified Logical Memory Test measured delayed thematic recall after 7 days following the first weekly dose.
- Primary outcomes were change from baseline to week 8 on modified SANS total and composite cognitive score, analyzed with ANCOVA controlling for baseline; exploratory analyses used ANCOVA and t-tests, with no correction for multiple comparisons.
Limitations
- Stated: the study was exploratory and preliminary; multiple outcomes were examined without correction for multiple tests; the SANS difference was in part due to worsening in the placebo group; the 7-day Logical Memory Test recall condition had not previously been studied or validated; proactive interference from story A may have influenced recall of story B; the standard cognitive battery did not specifically target memory consolidation.
- Evident from the text: the randomized sample was small (38 randomized, 33 completers) and the trial lasted only 8 weeks, limiting precision and generalizability; patients on clozapine were excluded.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Once-weekly D-cycloserine did not improve cognitive performance (composite cognitive score) at 8 weeks compared to placebo.
“Cognitive performance did not improve with D-cycloserine at 8 weeks.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“There was no effect of drug on the cognitive composite at week 8 (Table 2).”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“Once-weekly D-cycloserine did not improve cognitive functioning after 8 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
A single first dose of D-cycloserine significantly improved delayed thematic recall on the Logical Memory Test (7-day delayed recall) compared to placebo.
“Delayed thematic recall on the Logical Memory Test was significantly improved with the first dose of D-cycloserine compared to placebo.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Compared to placebo, the D-cycloserine group significantly improved on delayed thematic recall of the LMT administered at week 1 which reflected the first dose of study drug (F (1, 34) = 6.77, p = .01, effect size 0.9)”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“However, an exploratory test of verbal memory following a delay in recall of 7 days significantly improved after the first dose of D-cycloserine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
D-cycloserine was generally well-tolerated.
“D-cycloserine was generally well-tolerated (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the D-cycloserine group, change from baseline on the modified SANS total score did not correlate significantly with age, gender, antipsychotic type, or baseline SANS or PANSS total score.
“In the D-cycloserine group, change from baseline on the modified SANS total score did not correlate significantly with age, gender, antipsychotic type (typical or atypical), or baseline SANS or PANSS total score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 31.3% response rate (at least 20% improvement in modified SANS total score) in D-cycloserine-treated subjects did not differ significantly from the 11.8% response rate in placebo-treated subjects.
“However, the 31.3% response rate in subjects treated with D-cycloserine did not differ significantly from the 11.8% response rate in the placebo group (p>0.1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
No dropouts were directly attributed to D-cycloserine side effects.
“No dropouts were directly attributed to D-cycloserine side effects, although one subject in the D-cycloserine group dropped out with worsening of psychosis after discontinuing her antipsychotic medication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The significant difference between groups in SANS scores at week 8 was in part the result of worsening of negative symptoms in the placebo group.
“although statistical significance was, in part, the result of worsening of negative symptoms with placebo.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“the significant difference between groups in SANS scores at week 8 was in part the result of worsening in the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Once-weekly D-cycloserine 50 mg added to antipsychotic treatment significantly improved negative symptoms (modified SANS total score) compared to placebo at week 8 in stable adult schizophrenia outpatients.
“D-cycloserine significantly improved SANS total scores compared to placebo at week 8.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The modified SANS total score significantly improved at week 8 in the D-cycloserine group compared to the placebo group (p=0.048; Table 2).”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“D-cycloserine 50 mg administered once-weekly for eight weeks significantly improved negative symptoms compared to placebo in schizophrenia patients treated with a variety of antipsychotic agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
Response on delayed thematic recall of the LMT in the D-cycloserine group did not correlate with age, gender, antipsychotic type, or baseline score.
“Response on the delayed thematic recall of the LMT in the D-cycloserine group did not correlate with age, gender, antipsychotic type or baseline score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 16.6% net reduction in SANS total score with D-cycloserine compared to placebo (0.7 effect size) was the result of an 8% improvement in the D-cycloserine group and an 8% worsening in the placebo group.
“The 16.6% net reduction in SANS total score with D-cycloserine compared to placebo (0.7 effect size) was the result of an 8% improvement in the D-cycloserine group and an 8% worsening in the placebo group and was close to the threshold for statistical significance (p=0.048).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no difference in perseverative errors on the WCST between treatment groups at week 8.
“However, we found no difference in perseverative errors on the WCST between treatment groups at week 8 (F (1, 29) = 1.80, p = .19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Dropouts did not differ from completers on any demographic or clinical variable at baseline.
“Dropouts did not differ from completers on any demographic or clinical variable at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Dysregulation of NMDA receptors contributes to clinical and cognitive features of schizophrenia.
“Converging lines of evidence have implicated dysregulation of N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors as a factor contributing to clinical and cognitive features of schizophrenia (Goff and Coyle, 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goff and Coyle, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The mechanisms underlying therapeutic effects on negative symptoms and cognitive symptoms may be distinctly different.
“The improvement in negative symptoms and absence of improvement in cognition at eight weeks suggest that glutamatergic pharmacologic mechanisms may differ between these two psychopathological domains.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“It appears that the mechanisms underlying potential therapeutic effects on negative and cognitive symptoms may be distinctly different.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
- Premisecitation
D-cycloserine was effective for negative symptoms in one placebo-controlled trial in 47 schizophrenia patients.
“The glycine-site partial agonist, D-cycloserine, was effective for negative symptoms in one placebo-controlled trial in 47 schizophrenia patients (Goff, et al., 1999b), whereas several studies were negative (Duncan, et al., 2004, Goff, et al., 2005, van Berckel, et al., 1999) and D-cycloserine did not achieve significant efficacy in the meta-analysis (Tuominen, et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goff, et al., 1999b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Once-weekly dosing with D-cycloserine for 8 weeks produced persistent improvement of negative symptoms compared to placebo.
“Once-weekly dosing with D-cycloserine for 8 weeks produced persistent improvement of negative symptoms compared to placebo”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“Our results suggest that once-weekly dosing with D-cycloserine for eight weeks may be sufficient to produce improvement compared to placebo in negative symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
- Premisecitation
Glycine, a full agonist at the glycine modulatory site of the NMDA receptor, significantly improved negative symptoms in a meta-analysis of clinical trials in schizophrenia.
“A meta-analysis of clinical trials in schizophrenia found that glycine, a full agonist at the glycine modulatory site of the NMDA receptor, significantly improved negative symptoms (Tuominen, et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tuominen, et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
A single dose of D-cycloserine facilitated memory consolidation tested after 7 days on a test of thematic recall.
“Consistent with animal models, a single dose of D-cycloserine facilitated memory consolidation tested after 7 days on a test of thematic recall.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · hedged
“This finding is consistent with animal studies in which D-cycloserine facilitates memory consolidation, an effect that may only become evident after a delay of 24 hours.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 7-day delayed recall on the Logical Memory Test measures memory consolidation.
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · hedged
- Study design and conductown data
Placebo and D-cycloserine groups did not differ significantly on any demographic or clinical variable at baseline.
“Placebo and D-cycloserine groups did not differ significantly on any demographic or clinical variable at baseline (Table 1), nor did they differ in dropout rates (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Facilitation of learning and memory has been well-established in rodents and nonhuman primates with single dose administration of D-cycloserine.
“In contrast to the inconsistent findings in clinical trials with D-cycloserine, facilitation of learning and memory has been well-established in rodents and nonhuman primates with single dose administration of D-cycloserine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Five daily doses of D-cycloserine administered over a 10-day period completely attenuated the facilitation of extinction of conditioned fear in rats.
“Similarly, five daily doses of D-cycloserine administered over a 10-day period completely attenuated the facilitation of extinction of conditioned fear in rats (Parnas, et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Parnas, et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
NMDA channel blockers produce positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms characteristic of schizophrenia in healthy subjects.
“The observation that NMDA channel blockers produce positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms characteristic of schizophrenia in healthy subjects (Krystal, et al., 1994) led to clinical trials of agents that activate this receptor complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Krystal, et al., 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Schizophrenia patients exhibited a specific deficit in memory consolidation compared to healthy subjects in a study of procedural memory assessed during training and again after 24 hours.
“In a study of procedural memory assessed during training and again after 24 hours, schizophrenia patients exhibited a specific deficit in memory consolidation compared to healthy subjects (Manoach, et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Manoach, et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In anxiety disorders, intermittent treatment with D-cycloserine combined with cognitive behavioral therapy has produced persistent therapeutic effects.
“In anxiety disorders, intermittent treatment with D-cycloserine combined with cognitive behavioral therapy has produced persistent therapeutic effects (Davis, et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis, et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Previous trials in which glycine site agonists demonstrated efficacy for negative symptoms clearly displayed a gradual improvement in symptom ratings over time with a plateau after approximately six weeks.
“Previous trials in which glycine site agonists demonstrated efficacy for negative symptoms clearly displayed a gradual improvement in symptom ratings over time with a plateau after approximately six weeks (Goff, et al., 1999b, Heresco-Levy, et al., 1999, Tsai, et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Goff, et al., 1999b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Heresco-Levy, et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tsai, et al., 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Desensitization of NMDA receptors on cultured granule neurons occurred with partial agonists and with the full agonist glycine.
“Boje and colleagues (Boje, et al., 1993) demonstrated that desensitization of NMDA receptors on cultured granule neurons occurred with partial agonists and with the full agonist, glycine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boje, et al., 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Memory effects have been shown to attenuate with repeated dosing in animal studies.
“In contrast, we found an effect on memory consolidation after a single dose; memory effects have been shown to attenuate with repeated dosing in animal studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous trials employing daily dosing in schizophrenia also failed to produce cognitive benefit at eight weeks.
“Previous trials employing daily dosing in schizophrenia also failed to produce cognitive benefit at eight weeks (Goff, et al., 1999b, Goff, et al., 2005) although one trial found improvement on Sternberg’s Item Recognition Task after two weeks of daily dosing with D-cycloserine 50mg (Goff, et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Goff, et al., 1999b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goff, et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goff, et al., 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A 28 day interval was sufficient to restore the facilitative effect of D-cycloserine on conditioned fear extinction.
“In contrast, a 28 day interval was sufficient to restore the facilitative effect of D-cycloserine on conditioned fear extinction (Parnas, et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Parnas, et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The enhanced delayed recall of verbal memory after week 1 administration suggests that D-cycloserine effects on cognition may not be restricted to facilitation of conditioned fear extinction.
“The enhanced delayed recall of verbal memory after week 1 administration suggests that D-cycloserine effects on cognition may not be restricted to facilitation of conditioned fear extinction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 7-day delayed recall on the Logical Memory Test measures memory consolidation.
- May combine two claims. 23
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataImmediate thematic recall and immediate or delayed item recall on the Logical Memory Test did not differ between D-cycloserine and placebo.
“Performance on immediate thematic recall and item recall on the Logical Memory Test did not differ between treatments.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“but did not differ from the placebo group in immediate thematic recall on the LMT or in immediate or delayed item recall from week 1 (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Results · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataChange from baseline to week 8 on the PANSS positive symptom subscale and CGI did not differ between D-cycloserine and placebo groups.
“The change from baseline to week 8 on the PANSS positive symptom subscale and the CGI at week 8 did not differ between treatment groups (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSubjects were randomly assigned in blocks of four using a computerized randomization schedule to placebo or D-cycloserine prepared in identical capsules, and all research personnel were kept blind to treatment assignment.
“Subjects were randomly assigned in blocks of four using a computerized randomization schedule to placebo or D-cycloserine prepared in identical capsules by the research pharmacy. All research personnel were kept blind to treatment assignment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThirty-three subjects (87%) completed the 8-week trial.
“Baseline and week 1 assessments were completed by 37 subjects (97%); 33 subjects (87%) completed week 8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThese results must be considered preliminary since a number of outcomes were examined without correction for multiple tests.
“These results must be considered preliminary since a number of outcomes were examined without correction for multiple tests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe CONSIST trial failed to find efficacy with either glycine or D-cycloserine compared to placebo for negative symptoms or cognitive deficits in 171 schizophrenia patients, although significant differences in outcomes between sites complicate interpretation.
“More recently, the Cognitive and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Trial (CONSIST) failed to find efficacy with either glycine or D-cycloserine compared to placebo for negative symptoms or cognitive deficits in 171 schizophrenia patients, although significant differences in outcomes between sites complicate interpretation of this negative finding (Buchanan, et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buchanan, et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningBecause the story at week 1 (story B) was different from that at baseline (story A), proactive interference from story A may have influenced recall of story B.
“Because the story at week 1 (story B) was different from that at baseline (story A) proactive interference from story A may have influenced recall of story B.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe 7-day recall condition with the LMT was added as an exploratory measure to capture memory consolidation effects, but has not previously been studied or validated as an outcome measure.
“The use of a 7-day recall condition with the LMT was added as an exploratory measure to capture memory consolidation effects, but has not previously been studied or validated as an outcome measure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe absence of cognitive effect at week 8 is based on a standard cognitive battery that did not specifically target memory consolidation effects.
“Finally, the absence of cognitive effect at week 8 is based on a standard cognitive battery that did not specifically target memory consolidation effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe significant improvement in delayed but not immediate thematic recall on the LMT following the first administration of D-cycloserine is consistent with animal models in which learning effects of D-cycloserine are first detectable after a 24 hour interval, possibly reflecting the role of NMDA receptors in memory consolidation.
“The significant improvement in delayed but not immediate thematic recall on the LMT following the first administration of D-cycloserine is consistent with animal models in which learning effects of D-cycloserine are first detectable after a 24 hour interval, possibly reflecting the role of NMDA receptors in memory consolidation (Santini, et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Santini, et al., 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The 7-day delayed recall on the Logical Memory Test measures memory consolidation.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAs the first study of once-weekly dosing in schizophrenia, this study was exploratory and so results must be considered preliminary, particularly since negative symptoms worsened in the placebo group and several outcome measures were examined without correction for multiple comparisons.
“As the first study of once-weekly dosing in schizophrenia, this study was exploratory and so results must be considered preliminary, particularly since negative symptoms worsened in the placebo group and several outcome measures were examined without correction for multiple comparisons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: This is the first study of once-weekly dosing with D-cycloserine in schizophrenia.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPre-treatment with D-cycloserine for 15 days attenuated facilitation in mice of a maze learning task, and increasing the dose from 3 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg did not counter the tolerance.
“For example, pre-treatment with D-cycloserine for 15 days attenuated facilitation in mice of a maze learning task (Quartermain, et al., 1994). Increasing the D-cycloserine dose from 3 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg did not counter the tolerance produced by 15 days of pre-treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quartermain, et al., 1994
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSingle-dose administration of D-cycloserine consistently produced positive effects on memory and learning, whereas several studies demonstrated tachyphylaxis with repeated administration.
“Whereas single-dose administration of D-cycloserine consistently produced positive effects on memory and learning, several studies have demonstrated tachyphylaxis with repeated administration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationElevated concentrations of glycine or D-serine at the glycine recognition site prime the NMDA receptor for removal from the cell surface to the intracellular compartment, a process believed to represent a mechanism for desensitization of NMDA receptors.
“Recent evidence suggests that elevated concentrations of glycine or D-serine at the glycine recognition site “prime” the NMDA receptor for removal from the cell surface to the intracellular compartment (Nong, et al., 2003). This process of “internalization” is believed to represent a mechanism for desensitization of NMDA receptors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nong, et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause the SANS rating at week 8 was performed prior to the weekly D-cycloserine dose, intermittent dosing with D-cycloserine may produce persistent alterations in excitatory synapses involved in expression of negative symptoms.
“Furthermore, because the SANS rating at week 8 was performed prior to the weekly D-cycloserine dose, this finding indicates that intermittent dosing with D-cycloserine may produce persistent alterations in excitatory synapses involved in expression of negative symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause treatment groups were comparable at baseline and in change scores on other symptom ratings, the significant difference in SANS scores at week 8 most likely represents a true drug effect and is not the result of clinical worsening unique to the placebo group.
“Because the treatment groups were comparable in all demographic characteristics and on all clinical measures at baseline, as well as in change scores on other symptom ratings, it is most likely that the significant difference in SANS scores at week 8 represents a true drug effect and is not the result of clinical worsening unique to the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral studies of D-cycloserine for negative symptoms were negative, and D-cycloserine did not achieve significant efficacy in a meta-analysis.
“The glycine-site partial agonist, D-cycloserine, was effective for negative symptoms in one placebo-controlled trial in 47 schizophrenia patients (Goff, et al., 1999b), whereas several studies were negative (Duncan, et al., 2004, Goff, et al., 2005, van Berckel, et al., 1999) and D-cycloserine did not achieve significant efficacy in the meta-analysis (Tuominen, et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Duncan, et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goff, et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tuominen, et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMemory effects of D-cycloserine do not become evident until 24 hours after learning, a delay believed to reflect NMDA receptor modification of memory consolidation.
“Memory effects of D-cycloserine do not become evident until 24 hours after learning, a delay that is believed to reflect NMDA receptor modification of memory consolidation (Santini, et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Santini, et al., 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningBecause the study was exploratory, no corrections were made for multiple comparisons.
“Because the study was exploratory in nature, no corrections were made for multiple comparisons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAntipsychotics have been shown to alter NMDA sensitivity by a variety of mechanisms, including alterations in NMDA receptor density and subunit composition, changes in pharmacologic sensitivity of the glycine site, and in regulation of glutamate release.
“In addition, antipsychotics have been shown to alter NMDA sensitivity by a variety of mechanisms, including alterations in NMDA receptor density and subunit composition, changes in pharmacologic sensitivity of the glycine site, and in regulation of glutamate release (Goff, et al., 2002, Millan, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Goff, et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Millan, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn animals, spatial memory and visual recognition tests have also shown enhancement following a single dose of D-cycloserine, suggesting that a range of cognitive functions may respond in a similar pattern to D-cycloserine.
“In animals, spatial memory and visual recognition tests have also shown enhancement following a single dose of D-cycloserine (Matsuoka and Aigner, 1996, Quartermain, et al., 1994) suggesting that a range of cognitive functions may respond in a similar pattern to D-cycloserine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Matsuoka and Aigner, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Quartermain, et al., 1994
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationD-cycloserine is a relatively selective partial agonist at the glycine site with approximately 35%-68% activity compared to glycine for NMDA receptors containing NR2A or NR2B subunits and 192% activity for receptors containing the NR2C subunit.
“D-cycloserine is a relatively selective partial agonist at the glycine site with approximately 35%-68% activity compared to glycine for NMDA receptors containing NR2A or NR2B subunits and 192% activity for receptors containing the NR2C subunit (Sheinin, et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sheinin, et al., 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationD-cycloserine pre-treatment was associated with significantly greater improvements in acrophobia symptoms, physiological measures of anxiety, and behavioral ratings one week and three months after treatment in 28 acrophobia patients.
“D-cycloserine pre-treatment was associated with significantly greater improvements in acrophobia symptoms, physiological measures of anxiety, and behavioral ratings one week and three months after treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ressler, et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPreliminary evidence has suggested that the magnitude of D-cycloserine's effect on negative symptoms might be greater when D-cycloserine is added to first generation antipsychotics than to atypicals.
“In addition, preliminary evidence has suggested that the magnitude of D-cycloserine’s effect on negative symptoms might be greater when D-cycloserine is added to first generation antipsychotics, as in the daily dosing trial, than to atypicals (Evins, et al., 2002, Goff, et al., 1999a, Goff, et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Evins, et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goff, et al., 1999a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goff, et al., 1995
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile negative symptom effects increase over time with repeated dosing, enhancement of memory appears to diminish.
“While negative symptom effects increase over time with repeated dosing, enhancement of memory appears to diminish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationD-cycloserine significantly improved all outcome measures following completion of treatment and at 4-week follow-up in 27 patients with social anxiety disorder treated with D-cycloserine 50 mg or placebo before each of 4 weekly cognitive behavioral exposure sessions.
“Similarly, Hoffman and colleagues (Hofmann, et al., 2006) treated 27 patients with social anxiety disorder with D-cycloserine 50 mg or placebo one hour before each of 4 weekly cognitive behavioral exposure sessions for public speaking anxiety and found that D-cycloserine significantly improved all outcome measures following completion of treatment and at 4-week follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hofmann, et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA single pre-exposure dose of D-cycloserine resulted in partial tolerance to D-cycloserine's facilitative effect on fear extinction, and 5 pre-exposure doses separated by 48 hours fully attenuated the effect.
“Parnas and colleagues (Parnas, et al., 2005) found that a single pre-exposure dose of D-cycloserine resulted in partial tolerance to D-cycloserine’s facilitative effect on fear extinction and that 5 pre-exposure doses separated by 48 hours fully attenuated the effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Parnas, et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn an oral single-dose challenge study in 16 healthy subjects, D-cycloserine 15, 50 and 150 mg achieved maximal plasma levels beginning 30-60 minutes after administration; plasma levels remained stable over the four-hour period of monitoring.
“In an oral single-dose challenge study in 16 healthy subjects, D-cycloserine 15, 50 and 150 mg achieved maximal plasma levels beginning 30–60 minutes after administration; plasma levels remained stable over the four-hour period of monitoring (van Berckel, et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Berckel, et al., 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationD-serine was found to preferentially enhance reversal learning in mice, possibly mediated by long term depression (LTD) of glutamatergic neurotransmission.
“Recently, the glycine site full agonist, D-serine, was found to preferentially enhance reversal learning in mice, possibly mediated by long term depression (LTD) of glutamatergic neurotransmission (Duffy, et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Duffy, et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNMDA channel blockade with ketamine increases perseverative errors on the WCST in healthy subjects.
“Moreover, NMDA channel blockade with ketamine increases perseverative errors on the WCST in healthy subjects (Krystal, et al., 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Krystal, et al., 1994
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationD-cycloserine readily crosses the blood-brain barrier and is cleared by the kidneys unmetabolized with a serum half-life estimated between 7-15 hours.
“D-cycloserine readily crosses the blood-brain barrier and is cleared by the kidneys unmetabolized with a serum half-life estimated between 7–15 hours (Hanngren, et al., 1961).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hanngren, et al., 1961
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The 7-day delayed recall on the Logical Memory Test measures memory consolidation.
“Instead of the usual 30 minute interval for delayed recall we used a 7-day delayed recall to capture the overnight consolidation that is of interest with D-cycloserine.”
“The use of a 7-day recall condition with the LMT was added as an exploratory measure to capture memory consolidation effects, but has not previously been studied or validated as an outcome measure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Story themes are more reliably recalled than story items after a prolonged delay and better represent memory performance involved in psychotherapy or rehabilitation interventions.
“We expected that story themes would be more reliably recalled than story items after such a prolonged delay and would better represent memory performance involved in psychotherapy or rehabilitation interventions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A one-week interval between D-cycloserine doses avoids tachyphylaxis in schizophrenia patients.
“We adopted the approach of a one-week interval between doses of D-cycloserine 50 mg from successful trials in anxiety disorders to see if efficacy for cognitive deficits and negative symptoms of schizophrenia could be enhanced in an eight-week add-on trial.”
The paper relies on this without support.
This is the first study of once-weekly dosing with D-cycloserine in schizophrenia.
“As the first study of once-weekly dosing in schizophrenia, this study was exploratory and so results must be considered preliminary, particularly since negative symptoms worsened in the placebo group and several outcome measures were examined without correction for multiple comparisons.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Goff et al study, as the first study of once-weekly dosing in schizophrenia, was exploratory, so its results must be considered preliminary.
“• As the first study of once weekly dosing in schizophrenia, this study was exploratory and so results must be considered preliminary.”
From Clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia: what have we learned so far? (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
In the Goff et al trial, D-cycloserine facilitated memory consolidation (thematic recall test) tested after 7 days.
“• D cycloserine was associated with persistent improvement of negative symptoms compared with placebo and facilitated memory consolidation (thematic recall test) tested after 7 days.”
From Clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia: what have we learned so far? (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
In the Goff et al trial, D-cycloserine was associated with persistent improvement of negative symptoms compared with placebo.
“• D cycloserine was associated with persistent improvement of negative symptoms compared with placebo and facilitated memory consolidation (thematic recall test) tested after 7 days.”
From Clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia: what have we learned so far? (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- ConsistentF(1, 34) = 6.77reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .014
“F (1, 34) = 6.77, p = .01”
- ConsistentF(1, 29) = 1.8reported p = .19 · recomputed p = .190
“F (1, 29) = 1.80, p = .19”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378 · see citing works
Krystal, J. H. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030035004 · Cited by 3,330 · see citing works
Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., & Brandt, J. (1998) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/clin.12.1.43.1726 · Cited by 1,597 · see citing works
Strauss, E., & Spreen, O. (2009) · Cited by 1,441 · see citing works
Ressler, K. J., Rothbaum, B. O., Tannenbaum, L., Anderson, P., Graap, K., Zimand, E., Hodges, L., & Davis, M. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.11.1136 · Cited by 1,063 · see citing works
The Emerging Role of Glutamate in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Schizophrenia
GOFF, D. C., & Coyle, J. T. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1367 · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Self-citationD-Alanine Added to Antipsychotics for the Treatment of Schizophrenia
Tsai, G. E., Yang, P., Chang, Y., & Chong, M. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.032 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Augmentation of Exposure Therapy With D-Cycloserine for Social Anxiety Disorder
Hofmann, S. G., Meuret, A. E., Smits, J. A. J., Simon, N. M., Pollack, M. H., Eisenmenger, K., Shiekh, M., & Otto, M. W. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.3.298 · Cited by 560 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similarly, Hoffman and colleagues (Hofmann et al., 2006) treated 27 patients with social anxiety disorder with Dcycloserine 50 mg or placebo 1 h before each of 4 weekly cognitive behavioral exposure sessions for public speaking”
Self-citationWechsler Memory Scale–Third Edition
Dumont, R., & Willis, J. O. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced2206 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Effects of D-Cycloserine on Extinction: Translation From Preclinical to Clinical Work
Davis, M., Ressler, K., Rothbaum, B. O., & Richardson, R. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.084 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Efficacy of High-Dose Glycine in the Treatment of Enduring Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia
Heresco‐Levy, U., Javitt, D. C., Ermilov, M., Mordel, C., Silipo, G. S., & Lichtenstein, M. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.1.29 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Buchanan, R. W. (2005) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi020 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
GOFF, D. C., Tsai, G. E., Levitt, J. J., AMICO, E. T., Manoach, D. S., Schoenfeld, D., Hayden, D. L., McCarley, R. W., & Coyle, J. T. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.1.21 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Self-citationGlycine binding primes NMDA receptor internalization
Nong, Y., Huang, Y.-Q., Ju, W., Kalia, L. V., Ahmadian, G., Wang, Y.-T., & Salter, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01497 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Buchanan, R. W., Javitt, D. C., Marder, S. R., Schooler, N. R., Gold, J. M., McMahon, R. P., Heresco-Levy, U., & Carpenter, W. T. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06081358 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Santini, E., Muller, R. U., & Quirk, G. J. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-22-09009.2001 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
SAFTEE: a technique for the systematic assessment of side effects in clinical trials.
Levine, J., & Schooler, N. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Dose-finding trial of D-cycloserine added to neuroleptics for negative symptoms in schizophrenia
GOFF, D. C., Tsai, G. E., Manoach, D. S., & Coyle, J. T. (1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.8.1213 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Self-citationMillan, M. (2005) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-005-2199-1 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Glutamatergic drugs for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tuominen, H. J., Tiihonen, J., & Wahlbeck, K. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.005 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Quartermain, D., Mower, J., Rafferty, M. F., Herting, R. L., & Lanthorn, T. H. (1994) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0014-2999(94)90687-4 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
GOFF, D. C., Henderson, D. C., Evins, A. E., & AMICO, E. T. (1999) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00367-9 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationDuffy, S., Labrie, V., & Roder, J. C. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301486 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Effect on memory processing by D-cycloserine, an agonist of the NMDA/glycine receptor
Flood, J. F., Morley, J. E., & Lanthorn, T. H. (1992) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0014-2999(92)90709-d · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Effects of multiple exposures to d-cycloserine on extinction of conditioned fear in rats
Parnas, A. S., Weber, M. F., & Richardson, R. (2005) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2005.01.001 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Subunit specificity and mechanism of action of NMDA partial agonist d-cycloserine
Sheinin, A., Shavit, S., & Benveniste, M. (2001) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0028-3908(01)00073-9 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
A failure of sleep-dependent procedural learning in chronic, medicated schizophrenia
Manoach, D. S., Cain, M. S., Vangel, M. G., Khurana, A., GOFF, D. C., & Stickgold, R. (2004) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.09.012 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationGOFF, D. C., Herz, L. R., Posever, T. A., Shih, V. E., Tsai, G. E., Henderson, D. C., Freudenreich, O., Evins, A. E., Yovel, I., Zhang, H., et al. (2004) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-004-2032-2 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationd-Cycloserine added to risperidone in patients with primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia
Evins, A. E., Amico, E. T., Posever, T. A., Toker, R., & GOFF, D. C. (2002) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00220-1 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationGOFF, D. C., Hennen, J. A., Lyoo, I. K., Tsai, G. E., Wald, L. L., Evins, A. E., Yurgelun-Todd, D. A., & Renshaw, P. F. (2002) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01321-x · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of d-cycloserine on negative symptoms in schizophrenia
Duncan, E., Szilagyi, S., Schwartz, M. P., Bugarski‐Kirola, D., Kunzova, A., Negi, S., Stephanides, M., Efferen, T. R., Angrist, B., Peselow, E. D., et al. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.03.013 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
van Berckel, B. N. M. (1999) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(99)00014-7 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Matsuoka, N., & Aigner, T. G. (1996) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)20677-2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Boje, K. M., Wong, G., & Skolnick, P. (1993) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(93)91239-o · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Behavioral and Neuroendocrine Effects of the Partial NMDA Agonist D-cycloserine in Healthy Subjects
van Berckel, B. N. M. (1997) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(96)00196-0 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Schneider, J. S., Tinker, J. P., Velson, M. V., & Giardiniere, M. (2000) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02036-9 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Effects of scopolamine and d-cycloserine on non-spatial reference memory in rats
Andersen, J. M., Lindberg, V., & Myhrer, T. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00318-7 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Impaired visual memory in rats reared in isolation is reversed by d-cycloserine in the adult rat
Johannesen, T. S., & Myhrer, T. (2002) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0014-2999(02)01282-7 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
An autoradiographic study of the distribution of tritium-labeled cycloserine in mice.
Hanngren, H., HANSSON, E., & Ullberg, S. (1962) · PubMed · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Spreen O Strauss E A compendium of neuropsychological tests New York Oxford University Press 1991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels: Structure, Regulation, and Function
Traynelis, S. F., Wollmuth, L. P., McBain, C. J., Menniti, F. S., Vance, K. M., Ogden, K. K., Hansen, K. B., Yuan, H., Myers, S. J., & Dingledine, R. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.109.002451 · Cited by 3,568 · see citing works
Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels
Hansen, K. B., Wollmuth, L. P., Bowie, D., Furukawa, H., Menniti, F. S., Sobolevsky, A. I., Swanson, G. T., Swanger, S. A., Greger, I. H., Nakagawa, T., et al. (2021) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pharmrev.120.000131 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Dendritic structural plasticity and neuropsychiatric disease
Forrest, M. P., Parnell, E., & Penzes, P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2018.16 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Pittenger, C., Bloch, M. H., & Williams, K. (2011) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.09.006 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Burgdorf, J., Zhang, X.-L., Nicholson, K. L., Balster, R. L., David Leander, J., Stanton, P. K., Gross, A. L., Kroes, R. A., & Moskal, J. R. (2013) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2012.246 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Efficacy of D-Cycloserine for Enhancing Response to Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Panic Disorder
Otto, M. W., Tolin, D. F., Simon, N. M., Pearlson, G. D., Basden, S., Meunier, S. A., Hofmann, S. G., Eisenmenger, K., Krystal, J. H., & Pollack, M. H. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.036 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Self-citationKeefe, R. S. E., Buchanan, R. W., Marder, S. R., Schooler, N. R., Dugar, A., Zivkov, M., & Stewart, M. (2013) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbr153 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
D-Cycloserine in Neuropsychiatric Diseases: A Systematic Review
Schade, S., & Paulus, W. (2016) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyv102 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Failure of Neural Responses to Safety Cues in Schizophrenia
Holt, D. J., Coombs, G., Zeidan, M. A., Goff, D. C., & Milad, M. R. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2310 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationDrug targets for cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders.
Wallace, T. L., Ballard, T. M., Pouzet, B., Riedel, W. J., & Wettstein, J. G. (2011) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2011.03.022 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
D-cycloserine facilitation of cognitive behavioral therapy for delusions in schizophrenia
Gottlieb, J. D., Cather, C., Shanahan, M., Creedon, T., Macklin, E. A., & Goff, D. C. (2011) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2011.05.029 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationMinichino, A., Brondino, N., Solmi, M., Del Giovane, C., Fusar-Poli, P., Burnet, P., Cipriani, A., & Lennox, B. R. (2021) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.02.012 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Kuppili, P. P., Menon, V., Sathyanarayanan, G., Sarkar, S., & Andrade, C. (2021) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-020-02292-x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Pharmacological Treatment of Cognitive Dysfunction in Neuropsychiatric Disorders
Venero, C. (2015) · Cognitive Enhancement · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417042-1.00010-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- GOFF, D., CATHER, C., GOTTLIEB, J., EVINS, A., WALSH, J., RAEKE, L., OTTO, M., SCHOENFELD, D., & GREEN, M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Boston University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- GOFF, D
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 320-327
- ISSN
- 0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2628436
- OpenAlex
- W2123774291
- Semantic Scholar
- caddc13933f8f6d72e1821bb548ba003b690723f
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH060450, 2 P50 MH0060450-08A1, K24MH002025)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- D-cycloserine, schizophrenia
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cognition Disorders, Cycloserine, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Antipsychotic Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review