Cited by 51Growth and nutrition in plantsPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesPlanetary Science and Exploration

Geo-mineralogical characterisation of Mars simulant MMS-1 and appraisal of substrate physico-chemical properties and crop performance obtained with variable green compost amendment rates

Caporale, Antonio G., Vingiani, Simona, Palladino, Mario, El-Nakhel, Christophe, Duri, Luigi G., Pannico, Antonio, Rouphael, Youssef, De Pascale, Stefania +1 more·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The configuration of a biologically fertile substrate for edible plant growth during long-term manned missions to Mars constitutes one of the main challenges in space research. Mars regolith amendment with compost derived from crew and crop waste in bioregenerative life support systems (BLSS) may generate a substrate able to extend crew autonomy and long-term survival in space. In this context, the aim of our work was threefold: first, to study the geochemistry and mineralogy of Mojave Mars Simulant (MMS-1) and the physico-chemical and hydraulic properties of mixtures obtained by mixing MMS-1 and green compost at varying rates (0:100, 30:70, 70:30, 100:0; v:v); secondly, to evaluate the potential use of MMS-1 as a growing medium of two lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivars; thirdly, to assess how compost addition may impact on sustainability of space agriculture by exploiting in situ resources. MMS-1 is a coarse-textured alkaline substrate consisting mostly of plagioclase, amorphous material and secondarily of zeolite, hematite and smectites. Although it can be a source of nutrients, it lacks organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur, which may be supplied by compost. Both cultivars grew well on all mixtures for 19 days under fertigation. Red Salanova lettuce produced a statistically higher dry biomass, leaf number and area than Green Salanova. Leaf area and plant dry biomass were the highest on 30:70 simulant:compost mixture. Nevertheless, the 70:30 mixture was the be…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137543

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The high pH of green compost (8.25) did not allow reduction of pH of R70C30 to sub-neutral level required for proper nutrient availability.

    “However, the high pH (8.25) did not allow to reduce the pH of the mixture R70C30 to the sub-neutral level required to ensure the proper nutrient availability (Caporale et al., 2020).”
  • MMS-1 is a coarse, alkaline material (pH 8.86) consisting of plagioclases, amorphous components, and zeolite, containing K, Ca, Mg, Fe, but lacking organic C, N, P, fine particles with colloidal properties, and suitable water retention.

    “The MMS-1 is a coarse, alkaline material (pH 8.86), consisting of a mixture of plagioclases, amorphous components, and zeolite, containing some essential plant nutrients (e.g., K, Ca, Mg, and Fe), but lacking organic C, N, P, fine particles with colloidal properties and a suitable water retention (Caporale et al., 2020).”
  • The green compost used showed a low C/N ratio, implying good N availability, and a good aromatic moiety, guaranteeing stability of organic matter and gradual mineral release over time.

    “The green compost (Vivai Gardea, Villafranca di Verona, Italy), from the natural, slow microbial decomposition of pruning waste and grass cuttings (3 months in controlled conditions), showed a low C/N ratio, implying a good N availability, and a good aromatic moiety, guaranteeing the stability of the organic matter and a gradual mineral release over time (Caporale et al., 2020).”
  • Despite Mars regolith simulant MMS-1 containing several essential nutrients for plant growth, it is not able to fulfil the plant requirements.

    “Despite Mars regolith simulant MMS-1 contains several essential nutrients for plant growth (Caporale et al., 2020), it is not able to fulfil the plant requirements.”
  • Amendment with green compost concomitantly resolves the disposal issue of organic effluents in future manned missions to Mars.

    “concomitantly resolving the disposal issue of organic effluents in future manned missions to Mars”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caporale, A. G., Vingiani, S., Palladino, M., El-Nakhel, C., Duri, L. G., Pannico, A., Rouphael, Y., De Pascale, S., & Adamo, P.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Vingiani, Simona
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
720
Pages
137543
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007184308
Cited by
51
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agenzia Spaziale Italiana
  • Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Growth and nutrition in plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
green waste compost, bioregenerative life support, space agriculture, Martian regolith, lettuce growth, lettuce, pore size distribution, in-situ resource utilization, plagioclase, zeolites, smectite, fertigation
MeSH terms
Composting, Agriculture, Life Support Systems, Soil, Biomass, Lactuca, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review