Cited by 242Sleep and related disordersPhysical Activity and HealthSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The effect of resistance exercise on sleep: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Kovacevic, Ana, Mavros, Yorgi, Heisz, Jennifer J., Fiatarone Singh, Maria A.·2018·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

Impaired sleep quality and quantity are associated with future morbidity and mortality. Exercise may be an effective non-pharmacological intervention to improve sleep, however, little is known on the effect of resistance exercise. Thus, we performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the acute and chronic effects of resistance exercise on sleep quantity and quality. Thirteen studies were included. Chronic resistance exercise improves all aspects of sleep, with the greatest benefit for sleep quality. These benefits of isolated resistance exercise are attenuated when resistance exercise is combined with aerobic exercise and compared to aerobic exercise alone. However, the acute effects of resistance exercise on sleep remain poorly studied and inconsistent. In addition to the sleep benefits, resistance exercise training improves anxiety and depression. These results suggest that resistance exercise may be an effective intervention to improve sleep quality. Further research is needed to better understand the effects of acute resistance exercise on sleep, the physiological mechanisms underlying changes in sleep, the changes in sleep architecture with chronic resistance exercise, as well its efficacy in clinical cohorts who commonly experience sleep disturbance. Future studies should also examine time-of-day and dose-response effects to determine the optimal exercise prescription for sleep benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.07.002

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kovacevic, A., Mavros, Y., Heisz, J. J., & Fiatarone Singh, M. A.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kovacevic, Ana
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
39
Pages
52-68
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2739140417
Cited by
242
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (296518)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
resistance training, sleep quality, sleep quantity, sleep architecture, aerobic exercise, concurrent training, anxiety, depression, non-pharmacological sleep intervention, exercise prescription
MeSH terms
Health Status, Humans, Quality of Life, Sleep, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review