Cited by 102Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Identifying women who are afraid of giving birth: A comparison of the fear of birth scale with the WDEQ-A in a large Australian cohort

Open access
Haines, H.M., Pallant, J.F., Fenwick, J., Gamble, J., Creedy, D.K., Toohill, J., Hildingsson, I.·2015·Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare

Abstract

Background The WDEQ-A is the most widely used measure of childbirth fear in pregnant women; however there is increasing discussion in the literature that simpler, more culturally transferrable tools may offer a better solution to identifying fearful women in clinical practice.Aim To compare the two item Fear of Birth Scale (FOBS) with the 33 item WDEQ-A in a large cohort of Australian pregnant women.Method Self-report questionnaires during second trimester including Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (WDEQ-A) and Fear of Birth Scale (FOBS). Correlation of FOBS and WDEQ-A was tested using Spearman's correlation coefficients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve assessed the sensitivity and specificity of possible cut-points on the FOBS against WDEQ-A cut-point of ≥85. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were determined. Fearful and non-fearful women as classified by both instruments were compared for differences in demographic, psycho-social and obstetric characteristics.Results 1410 women participated. The correlation between the instruments was strong (Spearman's Rho = 0.66, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC was 0.89 indicating high sensitivity with a FOBS cut-point of 54. Sensitivity was 89%, specificity 79% and Youden index 0.68. Positive predictive value was 85% and negative predictive value 79%. Both instruments identified high fear as significantly associated with first time mothers, previous emergency caesarean and women with self-reported anxiety and/or depression. Additionally FOBS identified a significant association between fearful women and preference for caesarean.Conclusion This study supports the use of the FOBS in clinical practice to identify childbirth fear in pregnant women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.srhc.2015.05.002

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Zar M, Wijma K, Wijma B. Pre and postpartum fear of childbirth in nulliparous and parous women Scandinavian Journal of Behavioral Therapy 2001;30(30):75-84.
  2. Ryding E, Wijma B, Wijma K, Rydhström H. Fear of childbirth during pregnancy may increase the risk of emergency cesarean section. Acta Obstetrica Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1998;77(5):542-7.
  3. Dancey C, Reidy J. Statistics without Maths for Psychology: using SPSS for Windows. London Prentice Hall; 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haines, H. M., Pallant, J. F., Fenwick, J., Gamble, J., Creedy, D. K., Toohill, J., & Hildingsson, I.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Haines, H.M.
Venue
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
204-210
ISSN
1877-5756 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W613523101
Cited by
102
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
NHMRC (APP1025099)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
fear of childbirth, Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire, pregnant women, screening instrument comparison, diagnostic accuracy, primiparous women, maternal anxiety and depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Australia, Cesarean Section, Depression, Fear, Female, Humans, Parity, Phobic Disorders, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Reference Values, ROC Curve, Cohort Studies, Area Under Curve, Parturition, Delivery, Obstetric, Pregnant Women, Pregnant People, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review