Cited by 1,282Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational and Psychological AssessmentsEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What is assessment for learning

Open access
Wiliam, Dylan·2011·Studies in Educational Evaluation

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 65 references

4 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bloom, 1984, The search for methods of instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring, Educational Leadership, 41, 4
  2. Brookhart, 2007, Expanding views about formative classroom assessment: A review of the literature, 43
  3. Dempster, 1992, Using tests to promote learning: A neglected classroom resource, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25, 213
  4. Kahl, 2005, Where in the world are formative tests? Right under your nose!, Education Week, 25, 11
  5. Köller, 2005, Formative assessment in classrooms: A review of the empirical German literature, 265
  6. Nyquist, J. B. (2003). The benefits of reconstruing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A meta-analysis. Unpublished Master of Science thesis, Vanderbilt University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Wiliam, D.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wiliam, Dylan
Venue
Studies in Educational Evaluation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
3-14
ISSN
0191-491X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977995727
Cited by
1,282
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 16
FWCI
172.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
  • IOE EPrints (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
assessment for learning, formative assessment, feedback, personalized learning, Benjamin Bloom, instructional decision-making, evidence-based teaching, teaching practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review