The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is assessment for learning
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Extant literature has demonstrated that teachers have limited capacity and skills to engage in high quality assessment practices that move learning forward.”
From Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning (2023) · cites this paper as Wiliam, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This relates to the idea that educational assessment is not solely a matter of gauging what a student has (and has not) learnt (Wiliam, 2011).”
From Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence (2022) · cites this paper as Wiliam, 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Effective feedback pinpoints gaps and errors, and offers explanations about what students should do to improve (Wiliam, 2011).”
From Assigning AI: Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts (2023) · cites this paper as Wiliam, 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To be effective, that feedback should be timely and goal-oriented, helping students achieve their objectives.”
From Assigning AI: Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts (2023) · cites this paper as Wiliam, 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Most of the recurring foci grouped around techniques associated with assessment for learning (Wiliam 2011)”
From Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? (2017) · cites this paper as Wiliam 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Self-citation(1999) · Cited by 6,308
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,203
Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine
Wiener, N. (2019) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11810.001.0001 · Cited by 5,085
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172171009200119 · Cited by 4,231
Self-citationPreparing teachers for a changing world: what teachers should learn and be able to do
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-1083 · Cited by 3,755
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Bloom, 1984, The search for methods of instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring, Educational Leadership, 41, 4
- Brookhart, 2007, Expanding views about formative classroom assessment: A review of the literature, 43
- Dempster, 1992, Using tests to promote learning: A neglected classroom resource, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25, 213
- Kahl, 2005, Where in the world are formative tests? Right under your nose!, Education Week, 25, 11
- Köller, 2005, Formative assessment in classrooms: A review of the empirical German literature, 265
- Nyquist, J. B. (2003). The benefits of reconstruing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A meta-analysis. Unpublished Master of Science thesis, Vanderbilt University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
BAİDOO-ANU, D., & OWUSU ANSAH, L. (2023) · Journal of AI · doi:10.61969/jai.1337500 · Cited by 3,939
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4337484 · Cited by 3,004
“In lieu of this, educators have consistently called on teachers to develop capacity to engage students in high-quality assessment practices (Earl, 2012; Wiliam, 2011; Willis, Adie, & Klenowski, 2013).”
BackgroundMaking Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education
Evans, C. (2013) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312474350 · Cited by 1,143
The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 · Cited by 839
Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654314564881 · Cited by 714
Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H. N., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487112473837 · Cited by 767
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008 · Cited by 469
A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements
Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416 · Cited by 389
Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075 · Cited by 409
Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review
Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3292 · Cited by 358
Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602 · Cited by 330
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y · Cited by 346
Assigning AI: Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts
Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4475995 · Cited by 319
Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible
Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001 · Cited by 276
Assessment and learning: fields apart?
Baird, J., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2017.1319337 · Cited by 280
Assessment Literacy Overlooked: A Teacher Educator's Confession
Popham, W. J. (2011) · The Teacher Educator · doi:10.1080/08878730.2011.605048 · Cited by 260
A Review of Feedback Models and Theories: Descriptions, Definitions, and Conclusions
Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.720195 · Cited by 368
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698 · Cited by 241
Development of Student Teachers’ Digital Competence in Teacher Education - A Literature Review
Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2014) · Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy · doi:10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-04-03 · Cited by 280
Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2018) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2018.1441127 · Cited by 214
Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: An exploration of the literature
Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842 · Cited by 209
Formative assessment as practice: the role of students’ motivation
Leenknecht, M. J. M., Wijnia, L., Köhlen, M., Fryer, L. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1765228 · Cited by 290
The Current State of Assessment Education
DeLuca, C., & Bellara, A. P. (2013) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487113488144 · Cited by 234
Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D., & Lodge, J. M. (2019) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8 · Cited by 190
Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., de Jong, L. H., van der Schaaf, M. F., Kremer, W. D. J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094 · Cited by 229
The impact of text versus video communication on instructor feedback in blended courses
Borup, J., West, R. E., & Thomas, R. L. (2015) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9367-8 · Cited by 164
Assessment of Clinical Skills With Standardized Patients: State of the Art Revisited
Swanson, D. B., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2013) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2013.842916 · Cited by 153
The Effectiveness and Features of Formative Assessment in US K-12 Education: A Systematic Review
Lee, H., Chung, H. Q., Zhang, Y., Abedi, J., & Warschauer, M. (2020) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2020.1732383 · Cited by 197
Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation
Hawe, E. M., & Dixon, H. R. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360 · Cited by 143
A Tool for Introducing Computer Science with Automatic Formative Assessment
Benotti, L., Martinez, M. C., & Schapachnik, F. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2017.2682084 · Cited by 141
A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice
O’Donovan, B. M., Rust, C., & Price, M. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774 · Cited by 139
Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.999024 · Cited by 135
Lam, R. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.01.006 · Cited by 135
Using Formative Assessment to Enhance Learning, Achievement, and Academic Self-Regulation
Andrade, H., & Heritage, M. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315623856 · Cited by 133
Technology and Assessment in Mathematics
Stacey, K., & Wiliam, D. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_23 · Cited by 124
Self-citationA meta-review of the student role in feedback
der Kleij, F. M. V., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.005 · Cited by 150
Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning—a critical review of literature
Zeng, W., Huang, F., Yu, L., & Chen, S. (2018) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-018-9281-9 · Cited by 157
Kippers, W. B., Wolterinck, C. H. D., Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., & Visscher, A. J. (2018) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.015 · Cited by 119
Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education
AlAli, R. M., & Wardat, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Religion · doi:10.61707/8y29gv34 · Cited by 167
Conceptualising variety in challenge-based learning in higher education: the CBL-compass
van den Beemt, A., de Watering, G. V., & Bots, M. (2022) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2022.2078181 · Cited by 126
Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation
Laveault, D., Allal, L., & Publishing, S. I. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0 · Cited by 105
Baas, D., Castelijns, J., Vermeulen, M., Martens, R. L., & Segers, M. S. R. (2014) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12058 · Cited by 143
Williams, A. E. (2024) · International Journal of Research in Education and Science · doi:10.46328/ijres.3404 · Cited by 139
Assessment quality and practices in secondary PE in the Netherlands
Borghouts, L. B., Slingerland, M., & Haerens, L. L. (2016) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2016.1241226 · Cited by 112
Uses of Technology in Lower Secondary Mathematics Education: A Concise Topical Survey
Drijvers, P. H. M., Ball, L., Barzel, B., Heid, M. K., Cao, Y., & Maschietto, M. (2016) · Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33666-4 · Cited by 21
Effectiveness and relevance of feedback in Higher Education: A study of undergraduate students
Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., Simão, A. M. V., & Barros, A. (2016) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.004 · Cited by 98
Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback
Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106658 · Cited by 98
DeLuca, C., Chávez, T. R., Bellara, A. P., & Cao, C. (2013) · The Teacher Educator · doi:10.1080/08878730.2012.760024 · Cited by 97
Zhaı, X. (2021) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-021-09901-8 · Cited by 103
Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2018) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2018.1430685 · Cited by 104
Distance mathematics teaching in Flanders, Germany, and the Netherlands during COVID-19 lockdown
Drijvers, P. H. M., Thurm, D., Vandervieren, E., Klinger, M., Moons, F., van der Ree, H., Mol, A., Barzel, B., & Doorman, M. (2021) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-021-10094-5 · Cited by 93
Kyaruzi, F. M., Strijbos, J.-W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. (2019) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1593103 · Cited by 104
Challenges and opportunities for classroom-based formative assessment and AI: a perspective article
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Zhang, Z., Sun, S. Z., Robertson, P., & McGrane, J. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1270700 · Cited by 125
Rasooli, A., Zandi, H., & DeLuca, C. (2018) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.008 · Cited by 90
Different versions of assessment for learning in the subject of physical education
Tolgfors, B. (2018) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2018.1429589 · Cited by 83
Fairness as a multifaceted quality in classroom assessment
Tierney, R. D. (2014) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.003 · Cited by 88
Spanish university assessment practices: examination tradition with diversity by faculty
Panadero, E., Fraile, J., Ruiz, J. F., Castilla-Estévez, D., & Ruiz, M. Á. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1512553 · Cited by 86
Validation of Assessment for Learning Questionnaires for teachers and students
Pat‐El, R., Tillema, H., Segers, M. S. R., & Vedder, P. H. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02057.x · Cited by 89
Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316 · Cited by 104
Assessing young learners’ foreign language abilities
Nikolov, M., & Timpe‐Laughlin, V. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444820000294 · Cited by 40
How Accurate Are Our Students? A Meta-analytic Systematic Review on Self-assessment Scoring Accuracy
León, S. P., Panadero, E., & García‐Martínez, I. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09819-0 · Cited by 106
Challenges for information technology supporting educational assessment
Webb, M., Gibson, D., & Forkosh‐Baruch, A. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12033 · Cited by 87
What matters for language learning?
Marconi, G., Cascales, C. C., Covacevich, C., & Halgreen, T. (2020) · OECD education working papers · doi:10.1787/5e06e820-en · Cited by 86
Group Work Assessment: Assessing Social Skills at Group Level
Forsell, J., Frykedal, K. F., & Chiriac, E. H. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419878269 · Cited by 78
Phenomenology and Pedagogy in Physical Education
Standal, Ø. F. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315775982 · Cited by 78
Developing classroom-based language assessment literacy for in-service EFL teachers: The gaps
Chun-shou, L., & Fan, S. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.03.003 · Cited by 78
Evaluating a large-scale implementation of Assessment for Learning in Sweden
Jönsson, A., Lundahl, C., & Holmgren, A. (2014) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.970612 · Cited by 78
Item difficulty estimation: An auspicious collaboration between data and judgment
Wauters, K., Desmet, P., & Noortgate, W. V. D. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.020 · Cited by 74
Assessing with new eyes? Assessment for learning in Norwegian physical education
Leirhaug, P. E., & Annerstedt, C. (2015) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2015.1095871 · Cited by 78
Leirhaug, P. E., & MacPhail, A. (2015) · Sport Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.975113 · Cited by 75
Chinese university EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of classroom writing assessment
Lu, W., Lee, I., & Park, M. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100890 · Cited by 82
Qualitative differences in academics’ conceptions of e-assessment
Mimirinis, M. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1493087 · Cited by 70
Asesmen Nasional (AN): Pengetahuan dan Persepsi Calon Guru
Novita, N., Mellyzar, M., & Herizal, H. (2021) · JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) · doi:10.36312/jisip.v5i1.1568 · Cited by 70
Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.751548 · Cited by 71
Brooks, C., Burton, R., der Kleij, F. M. V., Ablaza, C., Carroll, A., Hattie, J., & Neill, S. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103387 · Cited by 77
Pyle, A., & DeLuca, C. (2016) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2015.1118005 · Cited by 68
Chen, A., Zhang, Y., Jia, J., Liang, M., Cha, Y., & Lim, C. P. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13064 · Cited by 67
¿Cómo emplear las rúbricas para implementar una verdadera evaluación formativa?
Fraile, J., Pardo, R., & Panadero, E. (2017) · Revista Complutense de Educación · doi:10.5209/rced.51915 · Cited by 75
Wiliam, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.003 · Cited by 69
Self-citationWang, D., & Han, H. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12502 · Cited by 77
Beekman, K., Brinke, D. J.-T., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.008 · Cited by 66
Krijgsman, C., Mainhard, T., van Tartwijk, J., Borghouts, L. B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. L. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.005 · Cited by 76
La retroalimentación: La clave para una evaluación orientada al aprendizaje
García, C. C., & García, L. M. (2017) · Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.30827/profesorado.v21i2.10329 · Cited by 76
Assessing science inquiry skills of citizen science volunteers: a snapshot of the field
Stylinski, C. D., Peterman, K., Phillips, T., Linhart, J., & Becker-Klein, R. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education Part B · doi:10.1080/21548455.2020.1719288 · Cited by 64
Scaling Up Assessment for Learning: Progress and Prospects
Carless, D. R. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_1 · Cited by 66
Peer assessment in the objective structured clinical examination: A scoping review
Khan, R., Payne, M. W. C., & Chahine, S. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1309375 · Cited by 72
Bridging classroom assessment and self-regulated learning
Brandmo, C., Panadero, E., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2020.1803589 · Cited by 85
The Chatbots’ Challenge to Education: Disruption or Destruction?
Birenbaum, M. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13070711 · Cited by 61
Asesmen Nasional (AN): Pengetahuan dan Persepsi Calon Guru
Novita, N., Mellyzar, M., & Herizal, H. (2021) · JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) · doi:10.58258/jisip.v5i1.1568 · Cited by 60
Meylani, R. (2024) · Batı anadolu eğitim bilimleri dergisi · doi:10.51460/baebd.1386737 · Cited by 125
Assessment in Mathematics Education: Large-Scale Assessment and Classroom Assessment
Suurtamm, C., Thompson, D. R., Kim, R. Y., Díaz, L., Sayac, N., Schukajlow, S., Silver, E. A., Ufer, S., & Vos, P. (2016) · OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32394-7 · Cited by 36
We agree on what we see: Teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment practice
Veugen, M. J., Gulikers, J. T. M., & den Brok, P. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101027 · Cited by 77
Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review
Dugan, K. E., Mosyjowski, E. A., Daly, S. R., & Lattuca, L. R. (2021) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2808 · Cited by 68
Yang, L., Zhang, L. J., & Dixon, H. R. (2023) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101015 · Cited by 74
Analisis Pemahaman Guru Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) Mengenai Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM)
Fauziah, A., Sobari, E. F. D., & Robandi, B. (2021) · EDUKATIF JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN · doi:10.31004/edukatif.v3i4.608 · Cited by 58
Tan, J. P.-L., Koh, E., Jonathan, C. R., & Yang, S. (2017) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2017.41.7 · Cited by 58
Bolzer, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Fischer, F. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12091 · Cited by 57
Myyry, L., Karaharju‐Suvanto, T., Virtala, A., Raekallio, M. R., Salminen, O., Vesalainen, M., & Nevgi, A. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1887812 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiliam, D.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wiliam, Dylan
- ORCID
- Wiliam, Dylan
- Venue
- Studies in Educational Evaluation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 0191-491X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977995727
- Semantic Scholar
- 89b9babf1f0e542e6d9c11d9bc0bbb967f78476c
- Cited by
- 1,282
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 172.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- discovery.ucl.ac.uk
- Locations
- Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- IOE EPrints (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- assessment for learning, formative assessment, feedback, personalized learning, Benjamin Bloom, instructional decision-making, evidence-based teaching, teaching practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review