Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Multilingual Education and PolicySecond Language Learning and TeachingEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Putting translanguaging into practice: A view from England

Costley, Tracey, Leung, Constant·2020·System
DOI 10.1016/j.system.2020.102270
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Our understandings of multilingualism have changed significantly over the last 50 years. Whilst there is broad agreement of the positive benefits of multilingualism, we are still debating how best to harness and make use of multilingualism with respect to curriculum and pedagogy in different contexts. Many teachers find themselves working around tensions between monolingual educational policies and multilingual classroom realities. Translanguaging offers us potential new and flexible ways of responding to the needs and practices of multilingual students and addressing gaps between policy and classroom realities. In this paper, we explore the opportunities and constraints of adopting translanguaging practices in publicly funded schools in England where greater school-based curriculum autonomy is being mooted. Our discussion is informed by an analysis of policy documents and teacher interview data, which allowed us to begin to map out an agenda for change with regard to the realisation of translanguaging pedagogies within state-funded educational contexts in England.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2020.102270

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Edwards, 1992, vol. 87

Cited by

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Costley, T., & Leung, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Essex (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Costley, Tracey
ORCID
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
92
Pages
102270
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.system.2020.102270
OpenAlex
W3014312757
Cited by
24
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • System (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Keywords
translanguaging, multilingualism, multilingual learners, language policy, curriculum autonomy, state-funded schools, English schools, teaching practice, teacher perceptions, policy-practice gap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.