Cited by 140Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Spine microdomains for postsynaptic signaling and plasticity

Newpher, Thomas M., Ehlers, Michael D.·2009·Trends in Cell Biology

Abstract

Changes in the molecular composition and signaling properties of excitatory glutamatergic synapses onto dendritic spines mediate learning-related plasticity in the mammalian brain. This molecular adaptation serves as the most celebrated cell biological model for learning and memory. Within their micron-sized dimensions, dendritic spines restrict the diffusion of signaling molecules and spatially confine the activation of signal transduction pathways. Much of this local regulation occurs by spatial compartmentalization of glutamate receptors. Here, we review recently identified cell biological mechanisms regulating glutamate receptor mobility within individual dendritic spines. We discuss the emerging functions of glutamate receptors residing within sub-spine microdomains and propose a model for distinct signaling platforms with specialized functions in synaptic plasticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.02.004

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both membrane addition and membrane internalization are required for the growth and retraction of spines.

    “both membrane addition and membrane internalization are required for the growth and retraction of spines (Holtmaat and Svoboda, 2009;Newpher and Ehlers, 2009;Kelly et al, 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newpher, T. M., & Ehlers, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Ehlers, Michael D.
Venue
Trends in Cell Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
218-227
ISSN
0962-8924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066774087
Cited by
140
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Federation of European Neuroscience Societies
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32NS061406)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
dendritic spines, glutamate receptors, receptor mobility, synaptic plasticity, postsynaptic signaling, spatial compartmentalization, signal transduction, learning and memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Receptors, Glutamate, Membrane Microdomains, Dendritic Spines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review