Cited by 283Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Dysfunction of NMDA receptors in Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Zhang, Yan, Li, Peiyao, Feng, Jianbo, Wu, Minghua·2016·Neurological Sciences

Abstract

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) play a pivotal role in the synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity thought to underlie learning and memory. NMDARs activation has been recently implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) related to synaptic dysfunction. Synaptic NMDARs are neuroprotective, whereas overactivation of NMDARs located outside of the synapse cause loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and cell death. NMDARs dysfunction in the glutamatergic tripartite synapse, comprising presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons and glial cells, is directly involved in AD. This review discusses that both beta-amyloid (Aβ) and tau perturb synaptic functioning of the tripartite synapse, including alterations in glutamate release, astrocytic uptake, and receptor signaling. Particular emphasis is given to the role of NMDARs as a possible convergence point for Aβ and tau toxicity and possible reversible stages of the AD through preventive and/or disease-modifying therapeutic strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10072-016-2546-5

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Partial blockade of NMDAR overstimulation with NMDAR antagonists rescues Aβ-induced LTP impairment and cognitive function in various animal models.

    “The relevance of NMDAR in AD lends support from studies showing that partial blockade of NMDAR overstimulation with NMDAR antagonists rescues Aβ-induced LTP impairment and cognitive function in various animal models [69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Li, P., Feng, J., & Wu, M.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Minghua
Venue
Neurological Sciences
Published
2016-03-12
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
1039-1047
ISSN
  • 1590-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-3478
OpenAlex
W2293608890
Cited by
282
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
NMDA receptor, Alzheimer's disease, synaptic dysfunction, tripartite synapse, amyloid-beta, tau protein, glutamate release, astrocytes, synaptic plasticity, mitochondrial membrane potential, neuroprotection, disease-modifying therapy
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review