Cited by 173Axon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

Control of neuronal polarity and plasticity – a renaissance for microtubules?

Hoogenraad, Casper C., Bradke, Frank·2009·Trends in Cell Biology

Abstract

Microtubules have been regarded as essential structures for stable neuronal morphology but new studies are highlighting their role in dynamic neuronal processes. Recent work demonstrates that the microtubule cytoskeleton has an active role during different phases of neuronal polarization - microtubules and their stability determine axon formation, they maintain the identity of axons and they regulate the dynamics of dendritic spines, the major sites of excitatory synaptic input. Although microtubules fulfill distinct cellular functions at different developmental stages, the underlying molecular mechanisms are remarkably similar. Reccurring themes are that microtubules direct specific membrane traffic and affect actin dynamics to locally organize axon growth and spine dynamics. We review the novel role of microtubules during neuronal development and discuss models for microtubule-dependent signaling in neuronal plasticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.08.006

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The tight connection between microtubules and actin drives the guided extension of axons during neuronal development as well as the formation and activity of synapses in mature neurons.

    “Moreover the tight connection between microtubules and actin drives the guided extension of axons during neuronal development as well as the formation and activity of synapses in mature neurons67.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoogenraad, C. C., & Bradke, F.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Hoogenraad, Casper C.
  • Bradke, Frank
Venue
Trends in Cell Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
669-676
ISSN
0962-8924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011464940
Cited by
173
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
microtubules, neuronal polarity, neuroplasticity, axon formation, dendritic spines, neuronal development, membrane trafficking, actin dynamics, neuronal morphology
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Humans, Microtubules, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Signal Transduction, Cell Polarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review