Cited by 36Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourE-Government and Public Services

Beyond the privacy paradox: The moderating effect of online privacy concerns on online service use behavior

Jang, Changki, Sung, WookJoon·2021·Telematics and Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101715

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The subjective nature of privacy issues, the widespread expansion of online platforms, multi-party participation, the nature of data disclosure, and associated ethics make determining the contradictory effects between personal privacy issues and behavior challenging.

    “The subjective nature of privacy issues, the widespread expansion of online platforms, multi-party participation, the nature of data disclosure, and associated ethics make determining the contradictory effects between personal privacy issues and behavior challenging [106,107].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jang, C., & Sung, W.
Affiliations
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Sung, WookJoon
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
65
Pages
101715
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203679853
Cited by
36
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
Keywords
privacy paradox, online privacy concerns, individual innovativeness, moderating effect, e-government, privacy preservation, personality traits, South Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review