The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The neural code for written words: a proposal
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56 · Cited by 2,698
Language‐specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area
Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf094 · Cited by 1,254
Self-citationPerceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material
Reicher, G. M. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027768 · Cited by 1,252
Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area
Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049 · Cited by 776
Self-citationTsunoda, K., Yamane, Y., Nishizaki, M., & Tanifuji, M. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/90547 · Cited by 359
Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence
Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00674.x · Cited by 356
Self-citationTwo routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model.
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131 · Cited by 339
A Cohort Model of Visual Word Recognition
Johnson, N. F., & Pugh, K. R. (1994) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1994.1008 · Cited by 104
Analysis of standard and non-standard visual word format in the two hemispheres
Lavidor, M., Babkoff, H., & Faust, M. (2001) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00125-1 · Cited by 42
Cited by
Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex
Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17637 · Cited by 1,504
The Interactive Account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading
Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.001 · Cited by 720
Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M., & Cohen, L. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.031 · Cited by 717
Self-citationIlliterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3924 · Cited by 716
Self-citationNeuroscience and education: from research to practice?
Goswami, U. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1907 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- DEHAENE, S., COHEN, L., SIGMAN, M., & VINCKIER, F.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 335-341
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167044231
- Cited by
- 1,147
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 60.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The neural code for written words: a proposal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
- The paper
- DEHAENE, S., COHEN, L., SIGMAN, M., & VINCKIER, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
