Cited by 1,504Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesReading and Literacy Development

Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex

Open access
Huth, Alexander G., de Heer, Wendy A., Griffiths, Thomas L., Theunissen, Frédéric E., Gallant, Jack L.·2016·Nature

Abstract

The meaning of language is represented in regions of the cerebral cortex collectively known as the 'semantic system'. However, little of the semantic system has been mapped comprehensively, and the semantic selectivity of most regions is unknown. Here we systematically map semantic selectivity across the cortex using voxel-wise modelling of functional MRI (fMRI) data collected while subjects listened to hours of narrative stories. We show that the semantic system is organized into intricate patterns that seem to be consistent across individuals. We then use a novel generative model to create a detailed semantic atlas. Our results suggest that most areas within the semantic system represent information about specific semantic domains, or groups of related concepts, and our atlas shows which domains are represented in each area. This study demonstrates that data-driven methods--commonplace in studies of human neuroanatomy and functional connectivity--provide a powerful and efficient means for mapping functional representations in the brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature17637

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Semantics appear to be encoded in a distributed manner across many cortical regions including prefrontal, speech and language association cortices.

    “Semantics appear to be encoded in a distributed manner, across many cortical regions including prefrontal, speech and language association cortices67,68 (Fig. 1; Tang et al. 2023).”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies in the neural encoding literature all used LLMs that were only aware of the short-term context, with context window size as large as several tens of words.

    “Previous studies in the neural encoding literature all used LLMs that were only aware of the short-term context, i.e., where the context window size was as large as several tens of words1–10.”
  • LLMs have shown success in predicting neural signals associated with narrative processing.

    “Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown success in predicting neural signals associated with narrative processing”
  • In previous neural encoding studies, participants were exposed to language stimuli that encompassed hundreds and even thousands of words.

    “This was the case even though the participants in these studies were exposed to language stimuli that encompassed hundreds and even thousands of words.”
  • Current word embedding-based language encoding approaches treat each stimulus word independently and ignore context.

    “Current word embedding-based approaches treat each stimulus word independently and thus ignore the influence of context on language understanding.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Gallant, Jack L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-04
Volume
532
Issue
7600
Pages
453-458
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2344975321
Cited by
1,504
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 152 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 160 · 2019: 169 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
96.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey019684-08)
  • National Eye Institute (R01-EY019684, EY019684)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
semantic system, semantic maps, word meaning, language processing, semantic field, inter-individual consistency, human cerebral cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Semantics, Speech, Reproducibility of Results, Principal Component Analysis, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review