Cited by 717Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System

Open access
Vinckier, Fabien, Dehaene, Stanislas, Jobert, Antoinette, Dubus, Jean Philippe, Sigman, Mariano, Cohen, Laurent·2007·Neuron

Abstract

Visual word recognition has been proposed to rely on a hierarchy of increasingly complex neuronal detectors, from individual letters to bigrams and morphemes. We used fMRI to test whether such a hierarchy is present in the left occipitotemporal cortex, at the site of the visual word-form area, and with an anterior-to-posterior progression. We exposed adult readers to (1) false-font strings; (2) strings of infrequent letters; (3) strings of frequent letters but rare bigrams; (4) strings with frequent bigrams but rare quadrigrams; (5) strings with frequent quadrigrams; (6) real words. A gradient of selectivity was observed through the entire span of the occipitotemporal cortex, with activation becoming more selective for higher-level stimuli toward the anterior fusiform region. A similar gradient was also seen in left inferior frontoinsular cortex. Those gradients were asymmetrical in favor of the left hemisphere. We conclude that the left occipitotemporal visual word-form area, far from being a homogeneous structure, presents a high degree of functional and spatial hierarchical organization which must result from a tuning process during reading acquisition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.031

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Orthographic processing proceeds in a posterior-anterior sweep through left fusiform gyrus, with increased location-invariance and increased sensitivity to orthographic structure.

    “The evidence at present suggests that orthographic processing proceeds in a posterior–anterior sweep through left fusiform gyrus, with an increase in location-invariance (Dehaene et al., 2004) accompanied by increased sensitivity to orthographic structure (Vinckier et al., 2007).”

    From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Vinckier et al., 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ben-Shachar, M., Dougherty, R.F., Deutsch, G.K., and Wandell, B.A. (2007). Differential sensitivity to words and shapes in ventral occipito- temporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 17, 1604-1611. Published online Sep- tember 6, 2006. 10.1093/cercor/bhl071. · DOI
  2. Devlin, J.T., Jamison, H.L., Matthews, P.M., and Gonnerman, L.M. (2004). Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14984-14988.
  3. James, K.H., James, T.W., Jobard, G., Wong, A.C., and Gauthier, I. (2005). Letter processing in the visual system: different activation pat- terns for single letters and strings. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 5, 452-466.
  4. Price, C.J., Wise, R.J.S., and Frackowiak, R.S.J. (1996). Demonstrat- ing the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudo- words. Cereb. Cortex 6, 62-70. Neuron 55, 143-156, July 5, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc. 155 Neuron Hierarchical Coding of Words in the Visual System
  5. Thompson-Schill, S.L., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G.K., and Farah, M.J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14792- 14797.
  6. Tootell, R.B., Mendola, J.D., Hadjikhani, N.K., Liu, A.K., and Dale, A.M. (1998). The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cere- bral cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 818-824.
  7. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: the SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psy- chon. Bull. Rev. 8, 221-243.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M., & Cohen, L.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie (FR)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Laurent
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
143-156
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116945806
Cited by
717
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 51
FWCI
60.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
  • Human Frontier Science Program
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual word recognition, hierarchical coding, letter frequency, bigrams, fusiform gyrus, ventral stream, hemispheric lateralization, reading acquisition
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Occipital Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Reading, Temporal Lobe, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review