Cited by 65Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsCognitive Science and Education Research

Cognitive Biases

(Hans) Korteling, J.E., Toet, Alexander·2022·Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience, 2nd edition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.24105-9

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biases are largely caused by inherent or structural characteristics and mechanisms of the brain as a neural network.

    “Biases are largely caused by inherent (or structural) characteristics and mechanisms of the brain as a neural network (Korteling et al., 2018a; Korteling and Toet, 2020).”

    From Human- versus Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Korteling and Toet, 2020

  • Human higher cognitive capacities are developed from and with ancient neurobiological regulation mechanisms.

    “So, our “higher” cognitive capacities are developed from and with these (neuro) biological regulation mechanisms (Damasio, 1994; Korteling and Toet, 2020).”

    From Human- versus Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Korteling and Toet, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
(Hans) Korteling, J. E., & Toet, A.
Venue
Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience, 2nd edition
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2022
Pages
610-619
OpenAlex
W4211158788
Cited by
65
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
cognitive biases, decision-making, heuristics, judgment errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review