CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Action Observation and SynchronizationTeam Dynamics and PerformanceNeuroscience and Music Perception

Improvised herding: Mapping biobehavioral mechanisms that underlie group efficacy during improvised social interaction

Open access
Greenberg, David M., Milstein, Nir, Gilboa, Avi, Cohen, Shai, Haimovich, Nir, Siegman, Shahar, Pinhasi, Shay, Gordon, Ilanit·2023·Psychophysiology
DOI 10.1111/psyp.14307
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Improvisation is a natural occurring phenomenon that is central to social interaction. Yet, improvisation is an understudied area in group processes and intergroup relations. Here we build on theory and research about human herding to study the contributions of improvisation on group efficacy and its biobehavioral underpinnings. We employed a novel multimodal approach and integrative method when observing face‐to‐face interactions—51 triads (total N = 153) drummed together in spontaneous‐free improvisations as a group, while their electrodermal activity was monitored simultaneously with their second‐by‐second rhythmic coordination on a shared electronic drum machine. Our results show that three hypothesized factors of human herding—physiological synchrony, behavioral coordination, and emotional contagion—predict a sense of group efficacy in its group members. These findings are some of the first to show herding at three levels (physiological, behavioral, and mental) in a single study and lay a basis for understanding the role of improvisation in social interaction.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 48 triads who improvised together on electronic drums, group efficacy was predicted by higher individual emotional contagion, higher behavioral drumming coordination, and lower group electrodermal activity (EDA) synchrony. EDA synchrony during improvisation was greater than chance, supporting herding across physiological, behavioral, and mental levels.

Key findings

  • EDA synchrony during improvised drumming was significantly greater than random pairings: real data M = 0.47, SD = 0.45 vs. random M = 0.29, SD = 0.37; Kolmogorov–Smirnov p = 4.28 × 10⁻⁵.
  • In a linear mixed model predicting group efficacy, significant predictors were emotional contagion (estimate = 0.40, SE = 0.18, p = .03), drumming coordination (estimate = 0.001, SE = 0.001, p = .01), and lower group EDA synchrony (estimate = −0.80, SE = 0.37, p = .04).
  • Group efficacy was positively correlated with emotional contagion (r = .17, p = .041); group-level drumming coordination and EDA synchrony were not significantly correlated (r = −.01, p = .994).
  • Group BPM did not predict group efficacy (estimate = 0.005, SE = 0.004, p = .19) but did predict self-reported group synchrony (estimate = 0.009, SE = 0.003, p < .01), adding 18% variance above behavioral coordination (r² change = .18, F change = 12.67, p < .001); group-level IBI synchrony did not impact the group-efficacy model (estimate = 0.20, SE = 0.68, p = .77).

Methods

  • 51 triads (total N = 153) of Bar-Ilan University undergraduate psychology students were recruited; after exclusions, final analyses used 144 participants (32 men) in 48 groups. Participants completed a 5-min baseline, then improvised together on electronic drums for 4 min without a beat or talking, while EDA was recorded simultaneously.
  • Measures included EDA synchrony (cross-correlation of each dyad with ±3 s lag, averaged to group level), behavioral drumming coordination (all three members hitting within a 30-ms window, derived from MIDI data), trait emotional contagion, and a four-item group-efficacy scale; in-group agreement indices were ICC1 = 0.086, ICC2 = 0.877, rWG = 0.795.
  • Main analysis was a linear mixed model with group efficacy as the dependent variable and group-level EDA synchrony, individual trait emotional contagion, and group-level drumming coordination as predictors, controlling for prior structured-task condition and musical knowledge; additional models tested BPM and IBI synchrony.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the relationship between multimodal synchronies is complex and not fully understood, that EDA synchrony and drumming coordination were uncorrelated, and that future studies are needed to address these questions.
  • The paper states that heart-rate synchrony did not significantly impact group efficacy during improvisation, contrasting prior structured-drumming findings, and offers outcome-dependent and task-dependent explanations that require further validation.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was undergraduate psychology students at one university, predominantly women (32 men among 144 participants), with low prior familiarity and low musical knowledge; expert musicians were excluded, and the laboratory drumming improvisation may not generalize to other social interactions.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/psyp.14307

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 50 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Three hypothesized factors of human herding-physiological synchrony, behavioral coordination, and emotional contagion-predict a sense of group efficacy in group members.

    “Our results show that three hypothesized factors of human herding-physiological synchrony, behavioral coordination, and emotional contagion-predict a sense of group efficacy in its group members.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Drumming coordination positively predicts self-reported group synchrony (β = 0.00, p = .01).

    “Drumming coordination 0.00 0.00 2.92 (41.98) 0.01 0.00, 0.00”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A sense of group efficacy was positively correlated with emotional contagion (r = .17, p = .041).

    “As can be seen in Table S2, a sense of group efficacy was positively correlated with emotional contagion (r = .17,p = .041),and group-level behavioral drumming coordination and EDA synchrony were not significantly correlated (r = -.01,p = .994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Electrodermal activity synchrony significantly predicted a sense of synchrony (estimate = -0.59, SE = 0.27, p < .05).

    “Also, as can be seen, EDA synchrony and drumming coordination also were significant predicators of a sense of synchrony (estimate = -0.59,SE = 0.27, p < .05for EDA synchrony and estimate = 0.001, SE = 0.0001, p < .01 for drumming coordination).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Group BPM positively predicts self-reported group synchrony (β = 0.01, p = .00).

    “Group BPM 0.01 0.00 3.30 (44.28) 0.00 0.00, 0.01”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Group efficacy scores after the improvisational task were predicted by higher individual-level emotional contagion, higher drumming group coordination, and lower group electrodermal activity synchrony.

    “Results from this analysis showed that group efficacy scores after the improvisational task were predicted by higher individual-level emotional contagion, higher drumming group coordination, and lower group EDA synchrony (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The multilevel model of social alignment posits a feedback loop between three components across each level: a gap monitoring system, an observation-execution system, and a reward system.

    “This multilevel model of social alignment argues for a feedback loop between three components across each level: (1) a gap monitoring system that detects the distance (real or perceived) between the self and others (comprising the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex [dmPFC]), dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and anterior insula; (2) an observationexecution system regulating social alignment (comprising”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shamay-Tsoory et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Across different measures of the autonomic nervous system, physiological synchrony has been shown to link to relationship dynamics within groups and to group performance.

    “Across different measures of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), physiological synchrony has been shown to link to relationship dynamics within groups and to group performance (Gordon et al., 2020;Palumbo et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gordon et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Palumbo et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    One group was dropped from analyses because a participant reported high levels of distress and could not complete the study.

    “We dropped one group from the analyses since a participant reported high levels of distress and could not complete the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The increase from dyads to triads allows inferences about groups, which are not mere extensions of dyads but have unique processes and dynamics.

    “The increase from dyads to triads is significant-it allows us to make inferences about groups, which are not mere extensions of dyads, but rather have unique processes and dynamics that can be addressed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Collective efficacy has been previously related to performance in groups and to some aspects of group cohesion.

    “Also termed collective efficacy (Watson et al., 2001), this construct has been previously related to performance in groups (Chang & Bordia, 2001;Hodges & Carron, 1992;Kozub & McDonnell, 2000;Lent et al., 2006;Leo et al., 2015;Spink, 2016) and to some aspects of group cohesion (Paskevich et al., 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Watson et al., 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chang & Bordia, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Paskevich et al., 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The unstructured improvisational task mimicked the unstructured aspects of real-life social interactions in a way that prior laboratory experiments struggle to reproduce.

    “This improvisational task mimicked the unstructured aspects of real-life social interactions in a way that prior laboratory experiments struggle to reproduce.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The three components of social alignment provide an initial model and brain basis in which to investigate a shared sense of group efficacy.

    “These three components of social alignment provide an initial model and brain basis in which to investigate a shared sense of group efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Final analyses were conducted on data from 144 participants nested in 48 groups.

    “Final analyses were, therefore, conducted on the data collected from 144 participants (32 men) nested in 48 groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Due to technical or biological issues in physiological data analysis, physiological data from additional two groups could not be used.

    “Due to technical or biological issues in physiological data analysis, we could not use physiological data from additional two groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Moving beyond a dyadic paradigm enables measurement of group efficacy, which is a unique marker of group outcomes and less relevant for bonded dyads.

    “Moving beyond a dyadic paradigm enables us to measure group efficacy, which is a unique marker of group outcomes and less relevant for bonded dyads.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Coordination during group drumming has been shown to correlate with a subjective sense of synchrony in group drumming.

    “This coordination has been shown to correlate with a subjective sense of synchrony in group drumming (Gordon et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gordon et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    In-group agreement indices were ICC1 = 0.086, ICC2 = 0.877, and rWG = 0.795, indicating high in-group agreement.

    “The indices values were: ICC1 = 0.086, ICC2 = 0.877, rWG = 0.795.These values indicate high in-group agreement (Bliese, 1998;LeBreton & Senter, 2008;Lüdtke et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bliese, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites LeBreton & Senter, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lüdtke et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The effect size f2 = 0.15 was chosen because it indicates small-medium effect sizes similar to previous models on effects of physiological synchrony for group outcomes.

    “We set f 2 = 0.15 because it indicates small-medium effect sizes which were similar in the previous models we published on the effects of physiological synchrony for group outcomes (Gordon et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gordon et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The critical role of improvised herding for group efficacy and the ability of multimodal investigation to uncover shared group processes.

    “We further highlight the critical role of improvised herding for group efficacy and the ability of multimodal investigation to uncover shared group processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Improvisation leaves open the possibility for more naturally occurring processes of shifting between synchrony and asynchrony.

    “Along similar lines, improvisation (compared to a structured synchrony task) leaves open the possibility for more naturally occurring processes of shifting between synchrony and asynchrony”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    EDA is more predictive of group efficacy, whereas IBI may be better at capturing cohesion.

    “On a physiological level, it may be that EDA, which is a strict a measure of the sympathetic nervous system, is more predictive of group efficacy, whereas IBI is based on both sympathetic and parasympathetic outputs, and therefore may be better at capturing cohesion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: EDA is a marker of the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system.
    • Rests on an assumption: IBI is based on both sympathetic and parasympathetic outputs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Electrodermal activity data were visually inspected and corrupted portions up to 5% were replaced by linear spline interpolation.

    “When we found unusual peaks or sudden and unreasonable drops in the data, we used linear spline interpolation to replace the corrupted portions of the signal.We limited this to a maximum of 5% of each individual's data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The DLPFC may be an underlying mechanism in group improvisation and may impact group efficacy.

    “the DLPFC may be an underling mechanism in group improvisation and have an impact on group efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Electrodermal activity synchrony in improvised drumming was significantly larger than random and due to the actual group interaction and not spurious or due to similar task conditions across all groups.

    “which supports the notion that EDA synchrony in improvised drumming was significantly larger than random and due to the actual group interaction and not spurious or due to similar task conditions across all groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both EDA and IBI were associated with both affective components of group performance and cognitive aspects.

    “It is important to note that in a recent meta-analysis, both EDA and IBI were associated with both affective components of group performance (e.g., empathy and trust) and cognitive aspects (e.g., collective intelligence) (Mayo et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mayo et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Smoking habits and familiarity with group members did not impact the model significantly (smoking: estimate = 0.02, SE = 0.27, p = .98; familiarity: estimate = 0.23, SE = 0.20, p = .24).

    “Both factors did not impact the model significantly (estimate = 0.02, SE = 0.27, p = .98for smoking habits, and estimate = 0.23, SE = 0.20, p = .24for familiarity) (see Table S3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There are continuous fluctuations in the relationship between motion synchrony and heart rate synchrony while drumming.

    “In another study, we showed that there are continuous fluctuations in the relationship between motion synchrony and heart rate synchrony while drumming (Gordon et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gordon et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The DLPFC is activated in nonimprovisational musical tasks.

    “The DLPFC is also shown to be activated in nonimprovisational musical tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Six participants were discarded from physiological analyses according to the 5% rule.

    “According to this rule, we discarded six participants from the physiological analyses, which included 144 participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Predictive coding theory posits that the brain compares top-down and bottom-up signals, and minimizes prediction errors by updating top-down models.

    “Predictive coding argues that top-down input signals in the brain are compared with bottom-up signals that are centrally collected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Spratling, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The medial prefrontal cortex may be an integrative neural site between group members, whereby self and group narratives are processed, contributing to the formation of group identity during improvised interactions.

    “Since the mPFC is associated with autobiographical memory and narrative, it may be an integrative neural site between group-members, whereby self and group narratives are processed, contributing to the formation of group identity during improvised interactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Rhythm is a foundational element of music and non-musical domains including speech, animal communication, and movement.

    “Rhythm is a foundational element of what we know today as music, and is also a foundational element of non-musical domains, including speech, animal communication, and movement (Kotz et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kotz et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Listening to groove rhythm drumming activates the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC).

    “A study on groove rhythm, which is defined by rhythms that evoke dance, showed that listening to groove rhythm drumming (via”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fukuie et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Beats per minute and sense of synchrony does not reflect actual drumming coordination, just the perception of it.

    “suggesting that the BPM and sense of synchrony does not reflect actual drumming coordination, just the perception of it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The free improvisational task added ecological validity pertaining to the unstructured nature of many social interactions.

    “One of the distinct features of our experiment was the free improvisational task which added ecological validity pertaining to the unstructured nature of many social interactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Physiological synchrony also occurs in conflictual and competitive contexts.

    “This is important in the case of an improvisational task that can feature auditory tension, particularly within the context of prior research, which shows that physiological synchrony also occurs in conflictual and competitive contexts (Danyluck & Page-Gould, 2018, 2019;Levenson & Gottman, 1983).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Danyluck & Page-Gould, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Danyluck & Page-Gould, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Levenson & Gottman, 1983

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The improvisational nature of the task in this study may have introduced more task difficulty than the structured task in the previous study.

    “Since task difficulty is correlated with EDA (Malmberg et al., 2019;Mønster et al., 2016), the improvisational nature of the task in this study may have introduced more task difficulty than the structured task in our previous study (Gordon et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The paper's findings highlight the underlying interpersonal physiological and behavioral mechanisms of herding, along with individual-level mental mechanisms of contagion, that together give rise to group efficacy.

    “Based on this novel method, our findings highlight the underlying interpersonal physiological and behavioral mechanisms of herding, along with individual-level mental mechanisms of contagion, that together give rise to group efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Brain activation during improvisation is domain specific, with variations depending on whether musical improvisation is done individually or in social settings.

    “Prior research suggests that brain activation during improvisation is domain specific with variations dependent on whether musical improvisation is done individually or in social settings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Heart rate synchrony was positively associated with group cohesion during a structured drumming task.

    “This contrasts prior work that showed that heart rate synchrony was positively associated with group cohesion during a structured drumming task (Gordon et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gordon et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The article overcomes limitations of prior research by implementing a real face-to-face group interaction during an unstructured social setting using an improvisational drumming paradigm.

    “In conclusion, this article overcomes the limitations of prior research by implementing a real face-to-face group interaction during an unstructured social setting using an improvisational drumming paradigm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The brain strives to minimize prediction errors by updating top-down models.

    “According to theories of predictive coding, the brain strives to minimize prediction errors by updating the top-down models (Spratling, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Spratling, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

38 of 38

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Improvisation is understudied in the study of group processes and intergroup relations.

    “Yet, improvisation is an understudied area within the study of group processes and intergroup relations.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Previous research has yet to demonstrate the social consequences for such interpersonal functions in groups within a single design.

    “This hypothesis may seem obvious, but previous research has yet to demonstrate the social consequences for such interpersonal functions in groups within a single design.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Each of the three components of herding—physiological synchrony, behavioral coordination, and emotional contagion—can be empirically observed at both individual and interpersonal levels.

    “Each of these three components of herding-physiological synchrony, behavioral coordination, and emotional contagion-can be empirically observed at both individual and interpersonal levels.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    EDA is a marker of the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system.

    “a marker of the sympathetic branch of the ANS”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    IBI is based on both sympathetic and parasympathetic outputs.

    “IBI is based on both sympathetic and parasympathetic outputs”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Group efficacy is distinct from group cohesion.

    “group efficacy is distinct from group cohesion.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The group improvisational drumming task constitutes a form of human herding.

    “Improvised herding”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much existing research on IPS has focused on contexts where individuals are explicitly instructed to perform a social task.

    “Yet, to date, much of the existing research on IPS has focused on contexts where individuals are explicitly instructed to perform a social task.”

    From Interpersonal Synchronization of Autonomic Physiology via Mere Visual Contact (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Introduction describes improvisation as understudied and gives examples of physiological-synchrony research involving group activities. The Discussion contrasts this study’s free improvisation with a structured synchrony task in the authors’ earlier work. These passages support the contrast, but do not establish that much existing IPS research explicitly instructs participants to perform a social task. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • ICC2 is incompatible with ICC1 and the group size

    Major

    The paper reports three participants per group. With groups of three, the reported ICC1 of 0.086 implies ICC2 = (3 × 0.086)/(1 + 2 × 0.086) ≈ 0.220, not 0.877. This affects the stated evidence for agreement among group members.

  • The cited drumming study describes adolescents, not adults

    Minor

    The discussion describes Cahart et al. (2022) as a study of autistic adults, while the cited paper's title identifies its subjects as autistic adolescents.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Greenberg, D. M., Milstein, N., Gilboa, A., Cohen, S., Haimovich, N., Siegman, S., Pinhasi, S., & Gordon, I.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Gordon, Ilanit
ORCID
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-04-19
Volume
60
Issue
9
Pages
e14307-e14307
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
DOI
10.1111/psyp.14307
OpenAlex
W4366351688
Semantic Scholar
da4553543c080ca6a8e17dfe4230e2bb7928f7b1
Cited by
4
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation (1726/15, 2096/15)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
improvisation, group efficacy, group process, intergroup relations, physiological synchrony, electrodermal activity, rhythmic coordination, emotional contagion, social interaction, drumming, triads
MeSH terms
Social Interaction, Emotions, Group Processes, Humans, Music

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review