Cited by 285Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingCellular transport and secretion

Surface trafficking of receptors between synaptic and extrasynaptic membranes: and yet they do move!

Triller, Antoine, Choquet, Daniel·2005·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Concentration of neurotransmitter receptors at synapses is thought to result from stable binding to subsynaptic scaffold proteins. Recent data on synaptic plasticity have shown that changes in synaptic strength derive partly from modification of postsynaptic receptor numbers. This has led to the notion of receptor trafficking into and out of synapses. The proposed underlying mechanisms have under-evaluated the role of extrasynaptic receptors. Recent technological advances have allowed imaging of receptor movements at the single-molecule level, and these experiments demonstrate that receptors switch at unexpected rates between extrasynaptic and synaptic localizations by lateral diffusion. Variation in receptor numbers at postsynaptic sites is therefore likely to depend on regulation of diffusion by modification of the structure of the membrane and/or by transient interactions with scaffolding proteins. This review is part of the TINS Synaptic Connectivity series.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2005.01.001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Live-cell imaging techniques like FRAP and single molecule tracking changed the view that glutamate receptors are restricted to synapses.

    “Whereas reports based on static EM suggested that glutamate receptors are restricted to synapses (Nusser, 2000), live-cell imaging techniques like FRAP and single molecule tracking changed this view radically (Richards et al., 2004; Triller and Choquet, 2005).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Triller and Choquet, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Triller, A., & Choquet, D.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
133-139
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110493620
Cited by
285
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
neurotransmitter receptors, receptor trafficking, synaptic receptors, extrasynaptic receptors, lateral diffusion, synaptic plasticity, postsynaptic scaffolding proteins, single-molecule imaging, receptor mobility, membrane structure
MeSH terms
Animals, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Synapses, Synaptic Membranes, Receptors, Neurotransmitter, Protein Transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review