Cited by 716Microplastics and Plastic PollutionCultural Heritage Materials AnalysisSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research

FTIR and Raman imaging for microplastics analysis: State of the art, challenges and prospects

Open access
Xu, Jun-Li, Thomas, Kevin V., Luo, Zisheng, Gowen, Aoife A.·2019·TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115629

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, J.-L., Thomas, K. V., Luo, Z., & Gowen, A. A.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Jun-Li
  • Luo, Zisheng
Venue
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
119
Pages
115629
ISSN
0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969762450
Cited by
716
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 132 · 2025: 152 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 30
FWCI
13.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
microplastics, FTIR imaging, Raman imaging, chemical imaging, microplastic detection, microplastic quantification, environmental samples, standardization, automated analysis, background effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review