Cited by 259Agricultural and Biological ResearchPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesUltrasound and Cavitation Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Green ultrasound-assisted extraction of carotenoids based on the bio-refinery concept using sunflower oil as an alternative solvent

Li, Ying, Fabiano-Tixier, Anne Sylvie, Tomao, Valérie, Cravotto, Giancarlo, Chemat, Farid·2013·Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Abstract

A green, inexpensive and easy-to-use method for carotenoids extraction from fresh carrots assisted by ultrasound was designed in this work. Sunflower oil was applied as a substitute to organic solvents in this green ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE): a process which is in line with green extraction and bio-refinery concepts. The processing procedure of this original UAE was first compared with conventional solvent extraction (CSE) using hexane as solvent. Moreover, the UAE optimal conditions for the subsequent comparison were optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) and ultra performance liquid chromatography--diode array detector--mass spectroscopy (UPLC-DAD-MS). The results showed that the UAE using sunflower as solvent has obtained its highest β-carotene yield (334.75 mg/l) in 20 min only, while CSE using hexane as solvent obtained a similar yield (321.35 mg/l) in 60 min. The green UAE performed under optimal extraction conditions (carrot to oil ratio of 2:10, ultrasonic intensity of 22.5 W cm(-2), temperature of 40 °C and sonication time of 20 min) gave the best yield of β-carotene.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.07.005

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hamed, 2006, Edible oil as an alternative solvent for extraction of antioxidant components from natural herbs, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2, 567

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Li, Y., Fabiano-Tixier, A. S., Tomao, V., Cravotto, G., & Chemat, F.
Affiliations
  • Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse (FR)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Chemat, Farid
Venue
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
12-18
ISSN
1350-4177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010406025
Cited by
259
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4
FWCI
14.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasonics Sonochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
Keywords
ultrasound-assisted extraction, carotenoids, beta-carotene, carrot, sunflower oil, green extraction, biorefinery, extraction optimization, response surface methodology
MeSH terms
Sunflower Oil, Carotenoids, Chemical Fractionation, Hexanes, Plant Oils, Solvents, Time Factors, Ultrasonics, Green Chemistry Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review