Cited by 1,042Ultrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsAnalytical chemistry methods development

Ultrasound: A clean, green extraction technology

Tiwari, Brijesh K.·2015·TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trac.2015.04.013

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiwari, B. K.
Affiliations
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
Corresponding author
Tiwari, Brijesh K.
Venue
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
71
Pages
100-109
ISSN
0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W596920516
Cited by
1,042
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
14.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
ultrasound-assisted extraction, green solvents, solvent-free extraction, extraction mechanism, heat-sensitive compounds, water extraction, sustainable extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review