Cited by 65Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Efficacy of long-term monthly administration of ivermectin on the progress of naturally acquired heartworm infections in dogs

Venco, L., McCall, J.W., Guerrero, J., Genchi, C.·2004·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of prolonged monthly ivermectin treatment against Dirofilaria immitis in client-owned dogs with naturally acquired infections and to clinically monitor the animal's response to the slow killing of heartworms, with death of the worms distributed over a period of up to 2 years. A total of 17 male and female dogs of different breeds and ages were used. Prior to treatment, all of the dogs tested positive for heartworm antigen (Ag) and all but two had microfilariae (mf). The dogs were randomly allocated to one group of seven dogs which received a commercial formulation of ivermectin (minimum, 6 mcg IVM/kg) plus pyrantel (minimum, 5 mg PP/kg) (Heartgard Plus Chewables, Merial, Ltd.), another group of seven dogs which received a commercial formulation of IVM (min, 6 mcg/kg) (Heartgard Chewables, Merial Ltd.), and a group of three dogs which served as an untreated controls. All dogs were evaluated prior to initiation of treatment and thereafter at 3- to 5-month-intervals for mf, Ag, and radiographic and echocardiographic findings. All of the 17 dogs, with the exception of two dogs in the IVM group, had circulating mf of D. immitis prior to the 1st monthly dose, and a few also had mf of Dirofilaria repens. After 4 monthly doses, only one dog in the IVM/PP group and two dogs in the IVM group had a patent heartworm infection, and no heartworm mf were seen in the 14 treated dogs thereafter. After 10 monthly doses, the number of Ag-positive dogs in both of the treated groups decreased gradually. Efficacy, based on the reduction in number of Ag-positive dogs, was similar for the IVM/PP and IVM groups, with overall efficacy scores for the 14 dogs of 21, 21, 43, and 71% after 10, 14, 19, and 24 monthly doses, respectively. Two of the seven dogs treated with IVM/PP, one of the seven treated with IVM, and two of the three untreated controls showed echocardiographic evidence of a parasitic burden prior to treatment, and all of these scores had decreased by the end of the study. Only one dog (IVM/PP group) had a cardiovascular pattern of heartworm disease by echocardiography prior to treatment, but this dog's score increased to two and the scores of two additional dogs increased from zero to two (IVM group) or three (IVM/PP group) by the end of the study. Only 1 (IVM/PP group) of the 17 dogs showed a pulmonary pattern of heartworm disease by radiography prior to treatment, but this dog's score increased to three by the end of the study. The radiographic scores of two additional dogs in the treated groups increased from zero to three (IVM/PP) or two (IVM) by the end of the study. Thus, monthly administration of IVM to dogs with clinical, radiographic or echocardiographic evidence of heartworm disease is ill-advised and such treatment of even the asymptomatic dog should be done only with much caution and frequent monitoring by the veterinarian.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.024

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some researchers have observed that health of animals treated with ivermectin for 24 months can worsen.

    “Indeed, some researchers have observed that the health of animals treated with ivermectin for 24 months can worsen (438).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venco, L., McCall, J. W., Guerrero, J., & Genchi, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Genchi, C.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
124
Issue
3-4
Pages
259-268
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131159581
Cited by
65
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
canine heartworm disease, Dirofilaria immitis, ivermectin, pyrantel, microfilariae, Dirofilaria repens, treatment efficacy, dogs
MeSH terms
Animals, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Filaricides, Ivermectin, Male, Pyrantel, Random Allocation, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review