Cited by 55Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Non-invasive assessment of reproductive status and stress in captive Asian elephants in three south Indian zoos

Kumar, Vinod, Palugulla Reddy, Vivekananda, Kokkiligadda, Adiseshu, Shivaji, Sisinthy, Umapathy, Govindhaswamy·2014·General and Comparative Endocrinology

Abstract

Asian elephants in captivity need immediate attention to be bred so as to meet the increasing demand for captive elephants and to overcome the dependence on supplementing the captive stock with wild animals. Unfortunately, captive breeding programs across the globe have met with limited success and therefore more effort is needed to improve breeding in captivity. Endocrine profiling of reproductive hormones (progestagens and androgens) and the stress hormone (glucocorticoids) could facilitate better management and breeding strategies. In the present study, we investigated reproductive and stress physiology of 12 captive Asian elephants for 10-27 months using a non-invasive method based on steroid analysis of 1700 elephant dung samples. Most of the elephants were cycling regularly. Males during musth showed increased fecal androgen metabolite concentrations and exhibited a slight increase in fecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels. Elephants used in public festivals and processions showed significantly increased in faecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels. The results indicate that captive elephants require periodic health care, better husbandry practices and scientific management for sustainable captive population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.03.024

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fAM assay using a double-antibody EIA with anti-testosterone antibody (R156/7) was validated for Asian elephants.

    “Concentrations of fAM were quantified by a double-antibody EIA validated for Asian elephants [48] utilizing an anti-testosterone antibody (R156/7).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, V., Palugulla Reddy, V., Kokkiligadda, A., Shivaji, S., & Umapathy, G.
Affiliations
Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (IN)
Corresponding author
Umapathy, Govindhaswamy
Venue
General and Comparative Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
201
Pages
37-44
ISSN
0016-6480 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000708782
Cited by
55
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General and Comparative Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
Asian elephant, captive breeding, reproductive status, stress physiology, fecal glucocorticoid metabolites, musth, reproductive hormones, non-invasive sampling, dung analysis, public processions, zoo animal husbandry
MeSH terms
Androgens, Animals, Animals, Zoo, Elephants, Feces, Female, Glucocorticoids, Male, Reproduction, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review