Cited by 47Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMetastasis and carcinoma case studiesEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Cystadenocarcinoma of the abdominal wall following caesarean section: case report and review of the literature

Matter, Maurice, Schneider, Nicolas, McKee, Thomas·2003·Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

Objectives Endometriosis affecting surgical scars is a well-described entity that can complicate surgery involving hysterotomies. Malignant transformation is a rare event that has been reported complicating ovarian endometriosis mainly.Case A 60-year-old woman having in the past two uneventful caesarean deliveries presented with a solid lower abdominal mass. A surgical biopsy and then a radical resection of the lower half of the abdominal wall were performed, with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of endometrial origin. A diagnostic curettage excluded primary endometrial carcinoma. At 1 year she is NED.Conclusions This case report illustrates the carcinomatous transformation of an endometrial implant. Despite the rarity of such a diagnosis, it should be borne in mind when endometriosis in abdominal wall is suspected because an oncological resection is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.07.003

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical manifestations of abdominal wall endometriosis are often nonspecific, and patients may complain only of vague abdominal pain, a tender mass, or be asymptomatic.

    “Although the diagnosis may at times be made based on clinical presentation, in many scenarios, clinical manifestations of AWE are nonspecific, and patients may complain only of vague abdominal pain, a tender mass, or they may be asymptomatic (3).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matter, M., Schneider, N., & McKee, T.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Matter, Maurice
Venue
Gynecologic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
438-443
ISSN
0090-8258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042227870
Cited by
47
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynecologic Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
cystadenocarcinoma, abdominal wall, cesarean section, endometriosis, endometriotic implants, malignant transformation, postoperative scarring, radical resection, endometrioma
MeSH terms
Abdominal Neoplasms, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Cesarean Section, Cystadenocarcinoma, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Endometrial Neoplasms, Abdominal Wall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review