Cited by 54Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFace Recognition and Perception

Erratum to “A critical review of the influence of oxytocin nasal spray on social cognition in humans: Evidence and future directions” [Horm. Behav. 61 (2012) 410–418]

Guastella, Adam J., MacLeod, Colin·2012·Hormones and Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.04.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guastella, A. J., & MacLeod, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Guastella, Adam J.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
773
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156305491
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
oxytocin, nasal spray, social cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review