Cited by 119Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of oxytocin nasal spray and social cognition training for young people with early psychosis

Open access
Cacciotti-Saija, Cristina, Langdon, Robyn, Ward, Philip B., Hickie, Ian B., Scott, Elizabeth M., Naismith, Sharon L., Moore, Loretta, Alvares, Gail A. +2 more·2015·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Social-cognitive deficits contribute to poor functional outcomes in early psychosis; however, no effective pharmacological treatments exist for these problems. This study was the first to investigate the efficacy of an extended treatment of oxytocin nasal spray combined with social cognition training (SCT) to improve social cognition, clinical symptoms, and social functioning in early psychosis. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, between-subjects trial, 52 individuals (aged 16-35 years) diagnosed with an early psychosis schizophrenia-spectrum illness were recruited. Participants received oxytocin (24 International Units) or placebo nasal spray twice-daily for 6 weeks, combined with group SCT (2 × 1 hour weekly sessions for 6 weeks). An additional dose of oxytocin was administered before each weekly session. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-treatment, and at 3-month follow-up. Primary outcomes included the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, the Scale for the Assessment of Positive and Negative Symptoms, and the Social Functioning Scale. Secondary outcomes included self-report and behavioral assessments of social cognition, symptom severity, and social functioning. Results showed that on all primary and secondary outcomes, there was no benefit of oxytocin nasal spray treatment in comparison to placebo. Exploratory post hoc analysis suggested that increased use of nasal spray was, however, associated with reductions in negative symptoms in the oxytocin condition only. This study represents the first evaluation of oxytocin treatment for early psychosis. Although results suggest no benefit of oxytocin treatment, results also highlight an urgent need to consider nasal spray delivery and dose-related variables for future clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbu094

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [30]30. Marsh PJ, McGuire J, Polito V, et al. SoCog: Manual for Mental-state Reasoning and Emotion Recognition Training in Schizophrenia. Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. [33]33. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders — Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0), Biometrics Research. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  3. [42]42. Young A, Perrett D, Calder A, Sprengelmeyer R, Ekman P. Facial Expressions of Emotion: Stimuli and Tests (FEEST). Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. [48]48. Randolph C. RBANS Manual: Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1998. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cacciotti-Saija, C., Langdon, R., Ward, P. B., Hickie, I. B., Scott, E. M., Naismith, S. L., Moore, L., Alvares, G. A., Redoblado Hodge, M. A., & Guastella, A. J.
Affiliations
  • ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Guastella, Adam J.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2014-06-23
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
483-493
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2126398688
Cited by
119
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
oxytocin, nasal spray
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Psychotic Disorders, Social Perception, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Nasal Sprays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review