Cited by 283Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

The impact of a single administration of intranasal oxytocin on the recognition of basic emotions in humans: A meta-analysis

Open access
Shahrestani, Sara, Kemp, Andrew H, Guastella, Adam J·2013·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Many studies have highlighted the potential of oxytocin (OT) to enhance facial affect recognition in healthy humans. However, inconsistencies have emerged with regard to the influence of OT on the recognition of specific emotional expressions (happy, angry, fear, surprise, disgust, and sadness). In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of seven studies comprising 381 research participants (71 females) examining responses to the basic emotion types to assess whether OT enhances the recognition of emotion from human faces and whether this was influenced by the emotion expression and exposure time of the face. Results showed that intranasal OT administration enhances emotion recognition of faces overall, with a Hedges g effect size of 0.29. When analysis was restricted to facial expression types, significant effects of OT on recognition accuracy were specifically found for the recognition of happy and fear faces. We also found that effect sizes increased to moderate when exposure time of the photograph was restricted to early phase recognition (< 300 ms) for happy and angry faces, or later phase recognition for fear faces (> 300 ms). The results of the meta-analysis further suggest that OT has potential as a treatment to improve the recognition of emotion in faces, allowing individuals to improve their insight into the intentions, desires, and mental states of others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2013.86

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These meta-analyses yielded summarized effect sizes ranging from d=0.21 to d=0.48.

    “These studies yielded summarized effect sizes ranging from d=0.21 to d=0.48.”

    From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Moderation by Emotion Type section reports an effect size of Hedges’ g=0.210 for angry faces, close to the stated lower bound. It does not establish 0.48 as the upper bound: the same section reports g=0.591 for fearful faces, and the paper reports Hedges’ g rather than Cohen’s d (Statistical Analyses). No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three meta-analyses of the effects of intranasal oxytocin on human behavior have been published to date.

    “To date three meta-analyses of the effects of IN-OT on human behavior have been published.”

    From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [10]

    The title and Criteria for Considering Studies for this Review identify this paper as a meta-analysis of intranasal oxytocin’s effects on human emotion recognition. The Introduction also discusses another oxytocin meta-analysis. Our copy does not establish that exactly three meta-analyses of intranasal oxytocin’s effects on human behavior had been published to date. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Shahrestani et al. conducted a meta-analysis of studies examining the effect of oxytocin on recognition of basic emotions.

    “Shahrestani et al. conducted a meta-analysis of studies examining the effect of OT on recognition of basic emotions (7 effect sizes, total N = 381)(10).”

    From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Introduction says the meta-analysis examined oxytocin’s effect on recognition of basic facial emotions, and Study Characteristics reports seven independent studies comprising 381 participants. The citing sentence calls these “7 effect sizes,” but the source says seven studies; its Results report a heterogeneity statistic with 13 degrees of freedom, so the effect-size count is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The meta-analyses mentioned in this paper all tested for evidence of publication bias in the intranasal oxytocin literature, with mixed results.

    “The meta-analyses mentioned in this paper all tested for evidence of publication bias in the IN-OT literature, with mixed results (9–11).”
  • A few previous meta-analytic reviews have found that intranasal oxytocin improves recognition of anger and happiness, and increases ingroup trust among healthy individuals with small effect sizes.

    “A few previous meta-analytic reviews have found that intranasal oxytocin improves recognition of anger and happiness, and increases ingroup trust among healthy individuals with small effect sizes (Shahrestani et al., 2013;van Ijzendoorn and Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ekman P, Friesen W (1976). The Pictures of Facial Affect Database. Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shahrestani, S., Kemp, A. H., & Guastella, A. J.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Kemp, Andrew H
  • Guastella, Adam J
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2013-04-10
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
1929-1936
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W1965231812
Cited by
283
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 9
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (LP110100513, 571101)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, intranasal administration, facial emotion recognition, basic emotions, happy faces, fearful faces, angry faces, exposure time, social cognition
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Neuropeptides, Oxytocin, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review