Cited by 186Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Depersonalisation disorder: a cognitive–behavioural conceptualisation

Hunter, E.C.M., Phillips, M.L., Chalder, T., Sierra, M., David, A.S.·2003·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Depersonalisation (DP) and derealisation (DR) are subjective experiences of unreality in, respectively, one's sense of self and the outside world. These experiences occur on a continuum from transient episodes that are frequently reported in healthy individuals under certain situational conditions to a chronic psychiatric disorder that causes considerable distress (depersonalisation disorder, DPD). Despite the relatively high rates of reporting these symptoms, little research has been conducted into psychological treatments for this disorder. We suggest that there is compelling evidence to link DPD with the anxiety disorders, particularly panic. This paper proposes that it is the catastrophic appraisal of the normally transient symptoms of DP/DR that results in the development of a chronic disorder. We suggest that if DP/DR symptoms are misinterpreted as indicative of severe mental illness or brain dysfunction, a vicious cycle of increasing anxiety and consequently increased DP/DR symptoms will result. Moreover, cognitive and behavioural responses to symptoms such as specific avoidances, 'safety behaviours' and cognitive biases serve to maintain the disorder by increasing awareness of the symptoms, heightening the perceived threat and preventing disconfirmation of the catastrophic misinterpretations. A coherent model facilitates the development of potentially effective cognitive and behavioural interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00066-4

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunter, E. C. M., Phillips, M. L., Chalder, T., Sierra, M., & David, A. S.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hunter, E.C.M.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
1451-1467
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039048442
Cited by
185
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
depersonalization, derealization, anxiety disorders, panic, safety behavior, cognitive biases, avoidance, cognitive-behavioral model, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depersonalization, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review