Cited by 162Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Cerebral function in posttraumatic stress disorder during verbal working memory updating: a positron emission tomography study

Clark, C.Richard, McFarlane, Alexander C, Morris, Philip, Weber, Darren L, Sonkkilla, Cynon, Shaw, Marnie, Marcina, Jackie, Tochon-Danguy, H.J +1 more·2003·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background This study examined cerebral function in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during the updating of working memory to trauma-neutral, verbal information. Methods Ten PTSD and matched control subjects completed a visuoverbal target detection task involving continuous updating (Variable target condition) or no updating (Fixed target condition) of target identity, with updating activity estimated by condition comparison. Results Normal updating activity using this paradigm involved bilateral activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and inferior parietal lobe. The PTSD group lacked this activation in the left hemisphere and was significantly different from control subjects in this regard, but showed additional activation in the superior parietal lobe, bilaterally. Conclusions The pattern of parietal activation suggests a dependence on visuospatial coding for working memory representation of trauma-neutral, verbal information. Group differences in the relative involvement of the DLPFC indicate less dependence in PTSD on the executive role normally attributed to the left DLPFC for monitoring and manipulation of working memory content in posterior regions of the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01505-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, C. R., McFarlane, A. C., Morris, P., Weber, D. L., Sonkkilla, C., Shaw, M., Marcina, J., Tochon-Danguy, H. J., & Egan, G. F.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Clark, C.Richard
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
474-481
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142184494
Cited by
162
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, verbal working memory, working memory updating, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, superior parietal lobule, hemispheric lateralization, executive function, brain activation
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review