Cited by 165Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Dissociative responses to conscious and non-conscious fear impact underlying brain function in post-traumatic stress disorder

Open access
Felmingham, K., Kemp, A. H., Williams, L., Falconer, E., Olivieri, G., Peduto, A., Bryant, R.·2008·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Dissociative reactions in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been regarded as strategic responses that limit arousal. Neuroimaging studies suggest distinct prefrontal responses in individuals displaying dissociative and hyperarousal responses to threat in PTSD. Increased prefrontal activity may reflect enhanced regulation of limbic arousal networks in dissociation. If dissociation is a higher-order regulatory response to threat, there may be differential responses to conscious and automatic processing of threat stimuli. This study addresses this question by examining the impact of dissociation on fear processing at different levels of awareness. Method: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a 1.5-T scanner was used to examine activation to fearful ( versus neutral) facial expressions during consciously attended and non-conscious (using backward masking) conditions in 23 individuals with PTSD. Activation in 11 individuals displaying non-dissociative reactions was compared to activation in 12 displaying dissociative reactions to consciously and non-consciously perceived fear stimuli. Results: Dissociative PTSD was associated with enhanced activation in the ventral prefrontal cortex for conscious fear, and in the bilateral amygdala, insula and left thalamus for non-conscious fear compared to non-dissociative PTSD. Comparatively reduced activation in the dissociative group was apparent in dorsomedial prefrontal regions for conscious fear faces. Conclusions: These findings confirm our hypotheses of enhanced prefrontal activity to conscious fear and enhanced activity in limbic networks to non-conscious fear in dissociative PTSD. This supports the theory that dissociation is a regulatory strategy invoked to cope with extreme arousal in PTSD, but this strategy appears to function only during conscious processing of threat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291708002742

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an fMRI study, D-PTSD patients showed increased activity in amygdala, insula, and thalamus while fearful versus neutral facial expressions were presented nonconsciously.

    “In another fMRI study [86], patients with D-PTSD showed increased activity in the amygdala, insula, and thalamus while fearful versus neutral facial expressions were presented nonconsciously.”
  • In the same study, when images were presented consciously, dissociative patients showed increased activity in ventral PFC and diminished activity in dorsomedial PFC.

    “In the latter case, dissociative patients showed increased activity in ventral PFC and diminished activity in the dorsomedial PFC, suggesting a conscious over-modulation of emotions and suppression of self-referential processing [86].”
  • Fear states can be induced by combinations of internal and external triggers, some of which will be accessible to conscious processing, and some not.

    “Fear states can therefore be induced by combinations of internal and external triggers, some of which will be accessible to conscious processing, and some not.42”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [42]

  • In any particular situation the defense response is a function of the species-specific defense repertoire, genetic variations among strains, characteristics of the threat, and context, all influenced by individual differences.

    “In any particular situation the defense response will be a function of the species-specific defense repertoire,8 genetic variations among strains,26 characteristics of the threat, and context in which it occurs, all influenced by individual differences.§,27”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [27]

  • A review of available data suggests that tonic immobility, peritraumatic dissociation, and dissociative PTSD may be mediated by a shared neural network involving amygdala deactivation, absence of sympathetically mediated arousal symptoms, parasympathetic activation, and analgesia.

    “A review of available data suggests that tonic immobility, peritraumatic dissociation, and dissociative PTSD may be mediated by a shared neural network involving amygdala deactivation, absence of sympathetically mediated arousal symptoms (decreased skin conductance and an absence of heart rate increases), parasympathetic activation (a decrease in heart rate in some studies, presumably reflecting a”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [27]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Felmingham, K., Kemp, A. H., Williams, L., Falconer, E., Olivieri, G., Peduto, A., & Bryant, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Felmingham, K.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2008-02-25
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
1771-1780
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2144301044
Cited by
165
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, dissociation, fear processing, ventral prefrontal cortex, amygdala, insula, thalamus, hyperarousal, facial expressions, backward masking
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain, Consciousness, Dissociative Disorders, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review