Cited by 229Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Decreased experimental anxiety and voluntary ethanol consumption in rats following central but not basolateral amygdala lesions

Möller, Christian, Wiklund, Lisa, Sommer, Wolfgang, Thorsell, Annika, Heilig, Markus·1997·Brain Research

Abstract

A long-debated 'tension reduction' hypothesis postulates anti-anxiety effects to be important for ethanol reward, and states that elevated anxiety levels might predispose for ethanol consumption and addiction. Human data are contradictory, possibly due to heterogeneity of patient samples. In rats, baseline levels of experimental anxiety have been reported to correlate with voluntary ethanol consumption. Here, we addressed the possibility that mechanisms underlying experimental anxiety might be causally related to regulation of voluntary ethanol intake. Rats were bilaterally lesioned in central amygdala using microinjections of ibotenic acid. This resulted in a robust release of punished drinking in a modified Vogel conflict test, an effect typically seen with anxiety reducing drugs. This effect was specific, as unpunished drinking was unaffected by the lesion. On the elevated plus-maze, central amygdala lesions did not affect behaviour under baseline conditions, but attenuated the anxiogenic effect of restraint stress. Measures of locomotor activity were not affected. Voluntary ethanol consumption was examined in a two-bottle, free choice paradigm. Ethanol intake was markedly decreased in the lesion group. Total fluid intake was not affected. Basolateral amygdala lesions, which did not affect conflict behaviour, also left ethanol intake unaffected. These results are consistent with previous reports of an important role for central amygdala in anxiety related behaviours, and suggest that cell bodies located in central amygdala might be important in this context. Further, our results support a relation between experimental anxiety and voluntary ethanol consumption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00308-9

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Möller, C., Wiklund, L., Sommer, W., Thorsell, A., & Heilig, M.
Affiliations
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Heilig, Markus
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-06
Volume
760
Issue
1-2
Pages
94-101
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002100291
Cited by
229
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
central amygdala, basolateral amygdala, voluntary ethanol consumption, ethanol reward, Vogel conflict test, restraint stress, ibotenic acid lesions, ethanol addiction, two-bottle choice
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review