Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 392

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners

Wang, Min, Koda, Keiko, Perfetti, Charles A·2003·Cognition

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00232-9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Akamatsu, 1999, The effects of first language orthographic features on word recognition processing in English as a second language, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 381, 10.1023/A:1008053520326 · DOI
  2. Berent, 1995, A rose is a REEZ: the two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English, Psychological Review, 102, 146, 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.146 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.146 · Paper page
  3. Chen, 1995, Orthographic and phonological activation in recognizing Chinese characters, Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 58, 144, 10.1007/BF00571102 · DOI
  4. Cho, 1999, Orthographic and phonological activation in the semantic processing of Korean Hanja and Hangul, Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 481, 10.1080/016909699386167 · DOI
  5. Chua, 1999, Phonological recoding in Chinese logograph recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 876, 10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.876 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.876
  6. Coltheart, 2001, DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud, Psychological Review, 108, 204, 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Holm, 1996, The effect of first written language on the acquisition of English literacy, Cognition, 59, 119, 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00691-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Jared, 1999, The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 219, 10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.219 · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.219 · Paper page
  9. Jared, 1991, Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 356, 10.1037/0096-3445.120.4.358 · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.120.4.358 · Paper page
  10. Juffs, 2001, Psycholinguistically oriented second language research, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 207, 10.1017/S0267190501000125 · DOI
  11. Kim, 1999, Investigating phonological processing in visual word recognition: the use of Korean Hangul (alphabetic) and Hanja (logographic) scripts, Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 59, 6093
  12. Koda, 1989, Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 201, 10.1007/BF01067782 · DOI
  13. Koda, 1999, Developing L2 intraword orthographic sensitivity and decoding skills, The Modern Language Journal, 83, 51, 10.1111/0026-7902.00005 · DOI
  14. Koda, 2000, Cross-linguistic variations in L2 morphological awareness, Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 297, 10.1017/S0142716400003015 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lesch, 1993, Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 285, 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.285 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.285
  16. Lukatela, 1993, Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: towed primes FROG, Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 461, 10.3758/BF03205193 · DOI
  17. Lukatela, 1994, Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107, 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.107 · DOI
  18. Lukatela, 1994, Visual lexical access is initially phonological: II. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331, 10.1037/0096-3445.123.4.331 · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.123.4.331 · Paper page
  19. Muljani, 1998, The development of word recognition in a second language, Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 99, 10.1017/S0142716400010602 · DOI
  20. Perfetti, 1991, Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: evidence from backward masking and priming, Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473, 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90017-E · DOI · Paper page
  21. Perfetti, 1988, Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: evidence from backward masking, Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59, 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90048-4 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Perfetti, 1998, The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in visual Chinese character identification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101, 10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.101 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.101 · Paper page
  23. Perfetti, 1995, Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 24, 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.24 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.24 · Paper page
  24. Read, 1986, The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing, Cognition, 24, 31, 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90003-X · DOI · Paper page
  25. Share, 1995, Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition, Cognition, 55, 151, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Share, 1995, Cognitive processes in early reading development: accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition, Issues in Education, 1, 1
  27. Stanovich, 1984, Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: issues of task comparability, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175, 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90120-6 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Taft, 1998, Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task, Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203, 10.1006/jmla.1997.2538 · DOI
  29. Taft, 1999, Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition, Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 498, 10.1006/jmla.1998.2625 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Tan, 1998, Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: a review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 165, 10.1023/A:1008086231343 · DOI
  31. Van Orden, 1988, Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371, 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.371 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wang, M., & Geva, E. (in press-a). Spelling acquisition of novel English phonemes in Chinese children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
  33. Wang, M., & Geva, E. (in press-b). Spelling performance of Chinese ESL children: lexical and visual-orthographic processes. Applied Psycholinguistics.
  34. Xu, 1999, The activation of phonology during silent Chinese word reading, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 838, 10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.838 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.838
  35. Yoon, H. K., Bolger, D. J., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Sublexical processes in learning to read: differences between Korean and English. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Scientific Studies of Reading, Montreal, Quebec.
  36. Yopp, 1988, The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests, Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159, 10.2307/747800 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Ziegler, 1995, Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings, Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 567, 10.1006/jmla.1995.1026 · DOI

Cited by

See all 392

Metadata

Authors
Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
129-149
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075934247
Cited by
392
References
4
FWCI
12.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00232-9
The paper
Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00232-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.