Cited by 276Face Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysisChild and Animal Learning Development

Developmental changes in face processing skills

Mondloch, Catherine J, Geldart, Sybil, Maurer, Daphne, Grand, Richard Le·2003·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Expertise in processing differences among faces in the spacing among facial features (second-order relations) is slower to develop than expertise in processing the shape of individual features or the shape of the external contour. To determine the impact of the slow development of sensitivity to second-order relations on various face-processing skills, we developed five computerized tasks that require matching faces on the basis of identity (with changed facial expression or head orientation), facial expression, gaze direction, and sound being spoken. In Experiment 1, we evaluated the influence of second-order relations on performance on each task by presenting them to adults (N=48) who viewed the faces either upright or inverted. Previous studies have shown that inversion has a larger effect on tasks that require processing the spacing among features than it does on tasks that can be solved by processing the shape of individual features. Adults showed an inversion effect for only one task: matching facial identity when there was a change in head orientation. In Experiment 2, we administered the same tasks to children aged 6, 8, and 10 years (N=72). Compared to adults, 6-year-olds made more errors on every task and 8-year-olds made more errors on three of the five tasks: matching direction of gaze and the two facial identity tasks. Ten-year-olds made more errors than adults on only one task: matching facial identity when there was a change in head orientation (e.g., from frontal to tilted up). Together, the results indicate that the slow development of sensitivity to second-order relations causes children to be especially poor at recognizing the identity of a face when it is seen in a new orientation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-0965(03)00102-4

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mondloch, C. J., Geldart, S., Maurer, D., & Grand, R. L.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Mondloch, Catherine J
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
67-84
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119997223
Cited by
276
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
face processing, face recognition (cognition), developmental changes, children, face inversion effect, head orientation, face identity, facial expressions, gaze direction
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Eye Movements, Face, Female, Head, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Posture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review