Cited by 269Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchGastrointestinal motility and disorders

How many functional somatic syndromes?

Nimnuan, Chaichana, Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, Wessely, Simon, Hotopf, Matthew·2001·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective Patients with medically unexplained symptoms are given diagnoses dependent upon the particular medical specialty consulted--irritable bowel syndrome in gastroenterology, fibromyalgia in rheumatology and others. The purpose of this paper is to establish whether these 13 different syndromes are discrete entities.Methods Consecutive new patients in seven outpatient clinics at two general hospitals were recruited. Patients completed questionnaires measuring symptoms and demographic data. Case notes were reviewed to ascertain whether the presenting symptoms were medically explained 3 months after the initial visit.Results Complete data were available for 550 subjects. With 37 unexplained symptoms included in the model, 30% of the total variance could be explained by one factor using unrotated principal component analysis. When the 13 identified functional syndromes were included, it was evident that functional syndromes could not be assumed to be independent. A two-factor model was the best fit for the present data after rotation.Conclusions This study suggests that the existence of distinct functional somatic syndromes (FSSynd) as defined clinically in medicine should be reconsidered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00224-0

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nimnuan, C., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Wessely, S., & Hotopf, M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hotopf, Matthew
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
549-557
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115163863
Cited by
269
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
functional somatic syndromes, medically unexplained symptoms, irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, syndrome classification, factor structure, symptom heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, London, Male, Medicine, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Somatoform Disorders, Specialization, Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review