Cited by 25Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchChronic Disease Management Strategies

Understand your illness and your needs": assessment-informed patient education for people with multiple functional somatic syndromes

Frølund Pedersen, H., Holsting, A., Frostholm, L., Rask, C., Jensen, J.S., Høeg, M.D., Schröder, A.·2019·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objectives Patients suffering from multiple functional somatic syndromes (FSS) such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, or irritable bowel syndrome, often lack both a clear diagnosis and tangible illness explanations, which is a barrier for treatment engagement. We tested a short-term intervention taking the unifying concept of Bodily Distress Syndrome (BDS) as a point of departure. The intervention consisted of a clinical assessment, group-based patient education, and one follow-up consultation.Methods 174 patients were included and received questionnaires at baseline, after clinical assessment, after patient education, and median 19 weeks after baseline. Data were analyzed using random effects models and simple t-tests. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed.Results We found small reductions in symptom levels, considerable reductions in illness worry, and improvement of illness perceptions and illness-related behaviors. Overall, patients evaluated the intervention positively and expressed high expectations for further treatment. Qualitative results mainly supported these findings.Conclusion Targeting illness perceptions through patient education is crucial to obtain patient engagement in self-help management or further treatment. This may lead to improved outcomes.Practical implications Physicians in primary and secondary care should strive to give patients with multiple FSS a clear understanding that their various FSS diagnoses are related and provide tangible illness explanations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.016

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frølund Pedersen, H., Holsting, A., Frostholm, L., Rask, C., Jensen, J. S., Høeg, M. D., & Schröder, A.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
102
Issue
9
Pages
1662-1671
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936021149
Cited by
25
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
TrygFonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
patient education, bodily distress syndrome, illness perception, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, group intervention, treatment engagement, symptom relief
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fibromyalgia, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review