CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Therapy and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Secondary Prevention as Context for Assessing Change Processes in Aggressive Children

Cavell, Timothy A., Hughes, Jan N.·2000·Journal of School Psychology
DOI 10.1016/s0022-4405(99)00040-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-4405(99)00040-0

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Coie, J. D. (1997). Initial outcome evaluation of the prevention trial. In R. J. McMahon (Chair), Prevention of antisocial behavior: Initial findings from the FAST Track Project. Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.
  2. Hughes, J. N., Gaur, A., Maris, L., Wende, K., Jackson, D., Zuniga, F., & Cavell, T. (1996). Correlates of peer-rated narcissism in children. Paper presented at the Kansas Conference in Clinical Child Psychology, Lawrence, KS, October.
  3. Lochman, 1992, Cognitive-behavioral intervention with aggressive boys, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 426, 10.1037/0022-006X.60.3.426 · DOI
  4. Lyons-Ruth, 1996, Attachment relationships among children with aggressive behavior problems, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 64, 10.1037/0022-006X.64.1.64 · DOI
  5. Rohner, R. P., Saavedra, J. M., & Granu, E. O. (1979). Parental Acceptance-Rejection Questionnaire: Test manual (1st Rev. ed.). In R. P. Rohner (Ed.), Handbook for the study of parental acceptance and rejection: Measurement of parental acceptance and rejection and associated behavioral dispositions. Storrs, CT: Center for the Study of Parental Acceptance and Rejection, University of Connecticut.
  6. Smith, A. M., Oxford, M., Cavell, T. A., & Hughes, J. N. (1999). Positive mentoring relationships with aggressive children: An analysis of mentor characteristics. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM, April.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 106

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cavell, T. A., & Hughes, J. N.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Cavell, Timothy A.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of School Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
199-235
ISSN
0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0022-4405(99)00040-0
OpenAlex
W1993247365
Cited by
105
References
73
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
aggressive children, secondary prevention, college student mentors, problem-solving training, intervention efficacy, mechanisms of change, iatrogenic disease, peer acceptance, self-rated competence, school-based intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review