Cited by 33Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsYouth Development and Social Support

Mentoring highly aggressive children: Pre-post changes in mentors’ attitudes, personality, and attachment tendencies

Faith, Melissa A., Fiala, Samuel E., Cavell, Timothy A., Hughes, Jan N.·2011·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

This study examined the degree to which mentoring highly aggressive children was associated with changes in mentors' attitudes, personality, and attachment tendencies. Participants were 102 college students who each mentored an aggressive, high-risk child across three academic semesters (spring, fall, spring). We examined pre- to post-mentoring changes in attitudes about mentoring efficacy and future parenting, Big Five personality characteristics, and attachment tendencies. Mentors also rated the impact of the mentoring relationship in their lives, and both mentors and mentees rated support of the mentoring relationship. Results indicated a statistically significant decrease over time in mentors' ratings of self-efficacy, openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness. These findings held even when controlling for ratings of relationship impact. However, mentors who rated the mentoring relationship as supportive tended to experience increased openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness and less attachment-related avoidance over time. Child-rated support negatively predicted mentors' post-mentoring attitudes toward future parenting. Discussed are the potential costs of mentoring highly aggressive children and strategies that could help increase benefits to mentors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-011-0254-8

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mentors who rated the mentoring relationship as supportive tended to experience increased openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness and less attachment avoidance at the end of the intervention.

    “Finally, mentors who rated the mentoring relationship as supportive tended to experience increased openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness and less attachment avoidance at the end of the intervention [65].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faith, M. A., Fiala, S. E., Cavell, T. A., & Hughes, J. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
  • Tarleton State University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Faith, Melissa A.
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2011-12
Volume
32
Issue
5-6
Pages
253-270
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W1975335074
Cited by
33
References
111
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hogg Foundation for Mental Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA 10037, R01DA010037)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
mentoring, aggressive children, college student mentors, Big Five personality traits, attachment avoidance, parenting attitudes, vulnerable children, personality change
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Attitude, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Mentors, Object Attachment, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review