Cited by 97Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentYouth Development and Social Support

Relationship quality and the mentoring of aggressive, high-risk children

Open access
Cavell, Timothy A., Elledge, L. Christian, Malcolm, Kenya T., Faith, Melissa A., Hughes, Jan N.·2009·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

We used data from a randomized clinical trial to examine the degree to which relationship quality predicted outcomes for aggressive children in two different mentoring programs. Data were available for 145 aggressive children in Grades 2 and 3. Children were blocked by school and randomly assigned to PrimeTime (n = 75) or Lunch Buddy (n = 70) programs. PrimeTime combined community-based mentoring with child-focused skills training and consultation for parents and teachers, and mentors were extensively trained and supervised. Lunch Buddy was a stand-alone, school-based mentoring program that involved lunchtime visits and a different mentor each semester. PrimeTime children rated their mentors as more supportive than did Lunch Buddy children. Relationship conflict predicted changes in teacher-rated externalizing problems. Ratings of relationship quality interacted with treatment in predicting changes in parent-rated externalizing behavior for PrimeTime children only.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374410802698420

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mentees' perceived high support from their mentors and low conflict within the mentoring relationship predicted a decrease in externalizing problems in a long-term mentoring program aimed at reducing aggressive behaviors.

    “Similarly, mentees’ perceived high support from their mentors and low conflict within the mentoring relationship predicted a decrease in externalizing problems in a long-term mentoring program aimed at reducing aggressive behaviors [47].”

    From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Discussion reports that children in less conflicted mentoring relationships had fewer teacher-rated externalizing problems, and the Results report that child-rated conflict predicted those problems through the two-year follow-up. But the Discussion says there was little evidence that perceived support predicted changes in teacher-rated externalizing problems; the claim incorrectly presents high mentee-perceived support as a predictor alongside low conflict. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies conducted in various short-term and long-term mentoring programs, with determined and undetermined termination points, showed that mentors' rating of how much support they provide to their mentees was related to a decrease in mentees' aggressive behavior.

    “Studies conducted in various short-term and long-term mentoring programs, with determined and undetermined termination points, showed that mentors’ rating of how much support they provide to their mentees was related to a decrease in mentees’ aggressive behavior [47,48].”

    From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [47]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cavell TA Hymel S Malcolm K Seay A Grusec JE Hastings PD Socialization and the development of antisocial behavior: Models and interventions Handbook of Socialization 2006 42 67 Guilford Press New York
  2. DuBois DL Neville HA Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristic and perceived benefits Journal of Community Psychology 1997 25 3 227 234
  3. Smith AM Does mentoring really work? A meta-analysis of mentoring programs for at-risk youth Unpublished doctoral dissertation 2002 Texas A&M University College Station

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavell, T. A., Elledge, L. C., Malcolm, K. T., Faith, M. A., & Hughes, J. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Cavell, Timothy A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2009-03-12
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
185-198
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2077426788
Cited by
96
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA 10037, R01DA010037)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
mentoring programs, aggressive children, vulnerable children, relationship quality, relationship conflict, externalizing problems, community mentoring, school-based mentoring, parent ratings, teacher ratings
MeSH terms
Aggression, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Community-Institutional Relations, Female, Humans, Male, Mentors, Parents, School Health Services, Observer Variation, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review