Cited by 920Memory Processes and InfluencesEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Frequency and the conference of referential validity

Hasher, Lynn, Goldstein, David, Toppino, Thomas·1977·Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80012-1

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 912

Metadata

Authors
Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • Villanova University (US)
Corresponding author
Hasher, Lynn
Venue
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
107-112
ISSN
0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034532433
Cited by
920
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
frequency of occurrence, confidence ratings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review