Cited by 667Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryMemory and Neural Mechanisms

On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution

Jacoby, Larry L.·1978·Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5371(78)90393-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Theories that attribute effects of gap to a reduced likelihood of information residing in short-term memory, such as most forms of deficient processing theory, do not seem to fit well with the present data.

    “Theories that attribute effects of gap to a reduced likelihood of information residing in short-term memory, such as most forms of deficient processing theory (Jacoby, 1978;Rundus, 1971), would not seem to fit well with present data”

    From Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention (2008) · cites this paper as Jacoby, 1978

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacoby, L. L.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Jacoby, Larry L.
Venue
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-12
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
649-667
ISSN
0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056068953
Cited by
667
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
problem solving, repetition, spacing effect, retention, word perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review