Cited by 232Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classification

Predicting age from the transcriptome of human dermal fibroblasts

Open access
Fleischer, Jason G., Schulte, Roberta, Tsai, Hsiao H., Tyagi, Swati, Ibarra, Arkaitz, Shokhirev, Maxim N., Huang, Ling, Hetzer, Martin W. +1 more·2018·Genome Biology

Abstract

Biomarkers of aging can be used to assess the health of individuals and to study aging and age-related diseases. We generate a large dataset of genome-wide RNA-seq profiles of human dermal fibroblasts from 133 people aged 1 to 94 years old to test whether signatures of aging are encoded within the transcriptome. We develop an ensemble machine learning method that predicts age to a median error of 4 years, outperforming previous methods used to predict age. The ensemble was further validated by testing it on ten progeria patients, and our method is the only one that predicts accelerated aging in these patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-018-1599-6

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An elastic net-based clock derived from binarized transcriptomic data improved chronological age prediction to an r2 of 0.92 and mean error of 6.63 years and could detect accelerated ageing in progeria samples.

    “Additionally, they demonstrated, using human fibroblast data from Fleischer et al.82, that an elastic net-based clock derived from binarized transcriptomic data improved chronological age prediction to an r2 of 0.92 and mean error of 6.63 years and could detect accelerated ageing in progeria samples.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [82]

  • The Fleischer et al. model was not evaluated on an independent test dataset.

    “However, the model was not evaluated on an independent test dataset, so it remains to be seen whether the method was a true improvement.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [82]

  • The Fleischer et al. method outperformed standard penalized linear regression-based clocks at chronological age prediction and uniquely detected accelerated ageing in progeria samples.

    “The method outperformed standard penalized linear regression-based clocks at chronological age prediction and uniquely detected accelerated ageing in progeria samples, suggesting that methods designed to be robust to transcriptional noise improve performance.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [82]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [27]Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd edition. New York: Springer; 2008.
  2. [28]Fleischer JG. Predicting age from the transcriptome of human dermal fibroblasts. Source code v0.1. [Internet]. Github; 2018. Available from: https://github.com/jasongfleischer/Predicting-age-from-the-transcriptome-of-human-dermal-fibroblasts/releases. Accessed 12 Dec 2018. PMC6300908 30567591
  3. [29]Shokirev MN. Predicting age from the transcriptome of human dermal fibroblasts. Data sets. [Internet]. Gene Expression Omnibus; 2018. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE113957. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleischer, J. G., Schulte, R., Tsai, H. H., Tyagi, S., Ibarra, A., Shokhirev, M. N., Huang, L., Hetzer, M. W., & Navlakha, S.
Affiliations
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hetzer, Martin W.
  • Navlakha, Saket
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2018-12
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
221-221
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2905232298
Cited by
232
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-NS096786, 1R01DC017695)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
age prediction, aging biomarkers, transcriptome, human dermal fibroblasts, RNA-seq, ensemble learning, Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome, accelerated aging, age-related diseases
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Child, Child, Preschool, Fibroblasts, Humans, Middle Aged, Progeria, Gene Expression Profiling, Genomics, Young Adult, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review