The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is especially true because corrective strategies may appear effective immediately yet backfire even after a short delay, when the message they tried to convey gradually fades from memory, allowing common misconceptions to be more easily remembered and identified as true [25].”
From Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies (2017) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. J. (1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.002 · Cited by 3,699
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543 · cited 1×
“Because messages from high credibility sources are more influential, as known since Hovland and Weiss (1951), this will further enhance the acceptance of the false claim—including its acceptance by others, who are told that one learned it from a credible source.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Heiman, 1990, Auditors' assessments of the likelihood of error explanations in analytical review, The Accounting Review, 65, 875
- Koonce, 1992, Explanation and counter‐explanation during audit analytical reviews, The Accounting Review, 67, 59
- Sanna, L. J., & Schwarz, N. (in press). Metacognitive experiences and hindsight bias: It's not just the thought (content) that counts! Social Cognition.
- Weaver, K., Garcia, S. M., Schwarz, N., & Miller, D. T. (in press). Metacognitive beliefs about group opinion: Inferences of extensity from familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 433
Spinoza’s error: Memory for truth and falsity
Nadarevic, L., & Erdfelder, E. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0251-z · Cited by 66
Rossen, I., Hurlstone, M. J., & Lawrence, C. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01483 · Cited by 71
Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., & Mayorga, M. W. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00616 · Cited by 68
Memory failure predicts belief regression after the correction of misinformationPreprint
Swire‐Thompson, B., Dobbs, M., Thomas, A. K., & Degutis, J. M. (2022) · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105276 · Cited by 75
Meaning in Context: Metacognitive Experiences
Schwarz, N. (2010) · Cited by 65
Self-citationWho said what: The effects of cultural mindsets on perceptions of endorser–message relatedness
Kwon, M., Saluja, G., & Adaval, R. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.01.011 · Cited by 64
Determinants of the Perceived Credibility of Rebuttals Concerning Health Misinformation
Sui, Y., & Zhang, B. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18031345 · Cited by 67
Misinformation and Its Correction
Wittenberg, C., & Berinsky, A. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.009 · Cited by 64
Does greenwashing affect Company's stock Price? Evidence from Europe
Teti, E., Etro, L. L., & Pausini, L. (2024) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103195 · Cited by 63
Debunking Biased Thinkers (Including Ourselves)
Ballantyne, N. (2015) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2014.17 · Cited by 61
Zhang, Y., Guo, B., Ding, Y., Liu, J., Qiu, C., Liu, S., & Yu, Z. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102935 · Cited by 59
Pictures and repeated exposure increase perceived accuracy of news headlines
Smelter, T. J., & Calvillo, D. P. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3684 · Cited by 58
Keehner, M., Mayberry, L., & Fischer, M. H. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0048-7 · Cited by 58
The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation
Susmann, M. W., & Wegener, D. T. (2021) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-021-01232-8 · Cited by 57
Keeping track of ‘alternative facts’: The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections
Gordon, A., Susanne Quadflieg, A., Brooks, J. C. W., Ecker, U. K. H., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.014 · Cited by 59
Religious beliefs are factual beliefs: Content does not correlate with context sensitivity
Levy, N. L. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.012 · Cited by 55
Cook, J., Bedford, D., & Mandia, S. A. (2014) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.5408/13-071.1 · Cited by 55
How Stories in Memory Perpetuate the Continued Influence of False Information
Hamby, A. M., Ecker, U. K. H., & Brinberg, D. L. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1135 · Cited by 53
Debunking Misinformation About Consumer Products: Effects on Beliefs and Purchase Behavior
Fong, J., Guo, T., & Rao, A. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437221147088 · Cited by 54
CHARITABLE GIVING, EMOTIONS, AND THE DEFAULT EFFECT
Fiala, L., & NOUSSAIR, C. N. (2017) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12459 · Cited by 51
The COVID-19 Infodemic and the Efficacy of Interventions Intended to Reduce Misinformation
Kreps, S. E., & Kriner, D. L. (2022) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfab075 · Cited by 51
A test of contemporary misconceptions in psychology
Gardner, R. M., & Brown, D. L. (2013) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.008 · Cited by 49
Living standards, poverty and inequality in the UK: 2012
Cribb, J., Joyce, R. C., & Phillips, D. (2017) · doi:10.1920/co.ifs.2012.0124 · Cited by 48
Advancing Framing Theory: Designing an Equivalency Frame to Improve Political Information Processing
Shulman, H. C., & Sweitzer, M. D. (2018) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqx006 · Cited by 47
When less is more: Sustainability messaging, destination type, and processing fluency
Hanks, L., Zhang, L., Line, N. D., & McGinley, S. P. (2016) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.07.002 · Cited by 47
Sanderson, J. A., Bowden, V. K., Swire‐Thompson, B., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2022) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/mac0000057 · Cited by 52
Photographs cause false memories for the news.
Strange, D., Garry, M., Bernstein, D., & Lindsay, D. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.006 · Cited by 39
Inferring Others' Hidden Thoughts: Smart Guesses in a Low Diagnostic World
Street, C. N. H., Bischof, W. F., Vadillo, M. A., & Kingstone, A. F. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1904 · Cited by 43
Schwarz, N., & Jalbert, M. C. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429295379-7 · Cited by 44
Self-citationWarning readers to avoid irrelevant information: When being vague might be valuable
Peshkam, A., Mensink, M. C., Putnam, A. L., & Rapp, D. N. (2010) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.006 · Cited by 47
Using metacognitive cues to amplify message content: a new direction in strategic communication
Shulman, H. C., & Bullock, O. M. (2019) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1570472 · Cited by 44
Kemp, P. L., Alexander, T. R., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2022) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-022-00434-1 · Cited by 40
Consumer Attitudes towards Food Preservation Methods
Guzik, P., Szymkowiak, A., Kulawik, P., & Zając, M. H. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11091349 · Cited by 39
Bots and Computational Propaganda: Automation for Communication and Control
Woolley, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.006 · Cited by 41
Topolinski, S. (2011) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2011.640078 · Cited by 40
The significance of folklore for vaccine policy: discarding the deficit model
Kitta, A., & Goldberg, D. S. (2016) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2016.1235259 · Cited by 39
Warnings of Adverse Side Effects Can Backfire Over Time
Steinhart, Y., Carmon, Z., & Yaacov Trope, B. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613478948 · Cited by 38
Refutations of Equivocal Claims: No Evidence for an Ironic Effect of Counterargument Number
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Jayawardana, K., & Mladenovic, A. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.07.005 · Cited by 37
The effect of nonprobative photographs on truthiness persists over time
Fenn, E., Newman, E. J., Pezdek, K., & Garry, M. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.004 · Cited by 45
Schwarz, N. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198789710.003.0002 · Cited by 40
Self-citationFacts and Where to Find Them: Empirical Research on Internet Platforms and Content Moderation
Keller, D., & Leerssen, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.011 · Cited by 39
When promoting a charity can hurt charitable giving: A metacognitive analysis
Smith, R. W., & Schwarz, N. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.01.001 · Cited by 37
Self-citationThe moral repetition effect: Bad deeds seem less unethical when repeatedly encountered.
Effron, D. A. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001214 · Cited by 44
The effectiveness of refutation text in confronting scientific misconceptions: A meta-analysis
Danielson, R., Jacobson, N. G., Patall, E. A., Sinatra, G. M., Adesope, O., Kennedy, A. A. U., Bhat, B. H., Ramazan, O., Akinrotimi, B., Nketah, G., et al. (2024) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2024.2365628 · Cited by 36
Why rebuttals may not work: the psychology of misinformation
Ecker, U. K. H. (2017) · Media Asia · doi:10.1080/01296612.2017.1384145 · Cited by 35
Democratic Creative Destruction? The Effect of a Changing Media Landscape on Democracy
Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.008 · Cited by 35
Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true
Laukkonen, R., Kaveladze, B. T., Protzko, J., Tangen, J. M., von Hippel, W., & Schooler, J. W. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05923-3 · Cited by 38
Varying Metacognition Through Public Opinion Questions: How Language Can Affect Political Engagement
Shulman, H. C., & Sweitzer, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x17707557 · Cited by 34
Combating Information Attacks in the Age of the Internet: New Challenges for Cognitive Engineering
Endsley, M. R. (2018) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720818807357 · Cited by 37
Lee, J. (2020) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1829708 · Cited by 34
The instinct fallacy: the metacognition of answering and revising during college exams
Couchman, J. J., Miller, N. E., Zmuda, S. J., Feather, K., & Schwartzmeyer, T. (2015) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-015-9140-8 · Cited by 38
Su, Y., Borah, P., & Xiao, X. (2022) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-06-2021-0305 · Cited by 36
Ecker, U. K. H., Sharkey, C. X. M., & Swire‐Thompson, B. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0281140 · Cited by 39
An Analysis of Rumor and Counter-Rumor Messages in Social Media
Goh, D. H., Chua, A. Y. K., Shi, H., Wei, W., Wang, H., & Lim, E. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70232-2_22 · Cited by 32
Winters, M., Oppenheim, B., Sengeh, P., Jalloh, M. B., Webber, N., Pratt, S., Leigh, B., Mölsted-Alvesson, H., Zeebari, Z., Sundberg, C. J., et al. (2021) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006954 · Cited by 34
Experience, prediction and recollection of loan burden
Hoelzl, E., Pollai, M., & Kamleitner, B. (2008) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.11.001 · Cited by 31
Walter, N., Murphy, S., & Gillig, T. K. (2017) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12112 · Cited by 26
de Bruin, W. B., Lefevre, C. E., Taylor, A. L., Dessai, S., Fischhoff, B., & Kovats, S. R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000083 · Cited by 30
What Makes Everyday Scientific Reasoning So Challenging?
(2017) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2016.11.006 · Cited by 29
Novin, S., & Oyserman, D. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01921 · Cited by 28
Reflection and Impulse as Determinants of Human Behavior
Krishna, A., & Strack, F. (2017) · Knowledge and space · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44588-5_9 · Cited by 32
Nah, S., Williamson, L. D., Kahlor, L. A., Atkinson, L., Upshaw, S. J., & Ntang-Beb, J.-L. (2023) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2023.2244169 · Cited by 29
Lee, K., & Shavitt, S. (2009) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.2.222 · Cited by 28
Trembath, D. L., Paynter, J. M., Keen, D., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2015) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489539.2015.1103433 · Cited by 28
A fake news inoculation? Fact checkers, partisan identification, and the power of misinformation
Morris, D. S. M., Morris, J. S., & Francia, P. L. (2020) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2020.1803935 · Cited by 28
“How dare you?”—The normative challenge posed by Fridays for Future
Spaiser, V., Nisbett, N., & Stefan, C. G. (2022) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000053 · Cited by 36
50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology
Sitzman, D. M., & Rhodes, M. G. (2011) · Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines · doi:10.5840/inquiryctnews201126222 · Cited by 27
Correcting the unknown: Negated corrections may increase belief in misinformation
Autry, K. S., & Duarte, S. E. (2021) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3823 · Cited by 26
Getting to the source of the illusion of consensus
Desai, S. C., Xie, B., & Hayes, B. K. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105023 · Cited by 31
Comparative Media Regulation in the United States and Europe
Fukuyama, F., & Grotto, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.010 · Cited by 28
Morgan, J. C., & Cappella, J. N. (2023) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2023.2192013 · Cited by 28
Heuristica: Designing a serious game for improving decision making
Mullinix, G., Gray, O. P., Colado, J. C., Veinott, E. S., Leonard, J., Papautsky, E. L., Argenta, C., Clover, M., Sickles, S., Castronova, E., et al. (2013) · IEEE International Games Innovation Conference (IGIC) · doi:10.1109/igic.2013.6659159 · Cited by 25
Vlasceanu, M., & Coman, A. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.015 · Cited by 25
Online Political Advertising in the United States
Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.007 · Cited by 26
Fulton, L. V., Ivanitskaya, L. V., Bastian, N. D., Erofeev, D. A., & Mendez, F. A. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.001 · Cited by 24
Fazio, L. K., Hong, M. K., & Pillai, R. M. (2023) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-023-00500-2 · Cited by 26
Explicit Reasons, Implicit Stereotypes and the Effortful Control of the Mind
Vierkant, T., & Hardt, R. (2015) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-015-9573-9 · Cited by 24
Communication Modalities and Political Knowledge
Eveland, W. P., & Garrett, R. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.018 · Cited by 23
Conclusion: The Challenges and Opportunities for Social Media Research
Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.014 · Cited by 24
Coronel, J. C., Poulsen, S., & Sweitzer, M. D. (2019) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqz012 · Cited by 29
Decision costs and price sensitivity: Field experimental evidence from India
Spears, D. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.06.012 · Cited by 27
The Virtue of Epistemic Trustworthiness and Re-Posting on Social Media
Wright, S. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863977.003.0012 · Cited by 21
Estimating Fact-checking's Eects † Evidence from a long-term experiment during campaign 2014
Nyhan, B. J., & Reifler, J. (2015) · Cited by 21
Till, B., Wild, T. A., Arendt, F., Scherr, S., & Niederkrotenthaler, T. (2018) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000516 · Cited by 21
Kemp, P. L., Loaiza, V. M., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-25649-6 · Cited by 21
Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections
Prike, T., Blackley, P., Swire‐Thompson, B., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2023) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-023-00492-z · Cited by 24
The cost of asking: How evaluations bias subsequent judgments.
White, L. C., Pothos, E. M., & Jarrett, M. (2020) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000136 · Cited by 23
An examination of corporate social responsibility and processing fluency in a service context
Zhang, L., & Mattila, A. S. (2015) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-11-2013-0307 · Cited by 21
Informing Public Perceptions About Climate Change: A ‘Mental Models’ Approach
Wong‐Parodi, G., & de Bruin, W. B. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9816-8 · Cited by 23
[Substernal goiters. 218 operated cases].
Cougard, P., Matet, P., Goudet, P., Bambili, R., Viard, H., Vaillant, G., Vergès, B. L., & Brun, J. M. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 21
Naive realism in public perceptions of neuroimages
Keehner, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2011) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2773-c1 · Cited by 21
Fake News: O Que É, Como Se Faz E Por Que Funciona?Preprint
Forster, R., de Carvalho, R. M., Filgueiras, A., & Avila, E. (2021) · doi:10.1590/scielopreprints.3294 · Cited by 29
Effects of Repeated Corrections of Misinformation on Organizational Trust: More is Not Always Better
Denner, N., Viererbl, B., & Koch, T. (2022) · International Journal of Strategic Communication · doi:10.1080/1553118x.2022.2135098 · Cited by 22
Veinott, E. S., Leonard, J., Papautsky, E. L., Perelman, B. S., Stankovic, A., Lorince, J., Hotaling, J. M., Ross, T. L., Todd, P. M., Castronova, E., et al. (2013) · IEEE International Games Innovation Conference (IGIC) · doi:10.1109/igic.2013.6659170 · Cited by 20
Could a woman be superman? Gender and the embodiment of power postures
Bailey, A. H., LaFrance, M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2017) · Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/23743603.2016.1248079 · Cited by 25
Does evaluating belief prior to its retraction influence the efficacy of later corrections?
Ithisuphalap, J., Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2020) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1752731 · Cited by 20
KARAKOÇ, E., & ZEYBEK, B. (2021) · Öneri Dergisi · doi:10.14783/maruoneri.908542 · Cited by 19
So, J., & Song, H. (2023) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqad025 · Cited by 21
Addressing Myths and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Randomized Trial
Steffens, M., Dunn, A. G., Marques, M. D., Danchin, M. H., Witteman, H. O., & Leask, J. (2021) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2020-049304 · Cited by 20
Predicting the virality of fake news at the early stage of dissemination
Esteban-Bravo, M., Jimenez-Rubido, L. D. L. M., & Vidal-Sanz, J. M. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123390 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C.
- Venue
- Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 127-161
- ISSN
- 0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1531042714
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 32.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- metacognition, metacognitive experience, judgment and decision making, bias mitigation, information campaigns, fluency, experiential information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review