The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is especially true because corrective strategies may appear effective immediately yet backfire even after a short delay, when the message they tried to convey gradually fades from memory, allowing common misconceptions to be more easily remembered and identified as true [25].”
From Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies (2017) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. J. (1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.002 · Cited by 3,699
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543 · cited 1×
“Because messages from high credibility sources are more influential, as known since Hovland and Weiss (1951), this will further enhance the acceptance of the false claim—including its acceptance by others, who are told that one learned it from a credible source.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Heiman, 1990, Auditors' assessments of the likelihood of error explanations in analytical review, The Accounting Review, 65, 875
- Koonce, 1992, Explanation and counter‐explanation during audit analytical reviews, The Accounting Review, 67, 59
- Sanna, L. J., & Schwarz, N. (in press). Metacognitive experiences and hindsight bias: It's not just the thought (content) that counts! Social Cognition.
- Weaver, K., Garcia, S. M., Schwarz, N., & Miller, D. T. (in press). Metacognitive beliefs about group opinion: Inferences of extensity from familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Self-citationUniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309341564 · Cited by 1,821
The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y · Cited by 1,372
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000465 · Cited by 1,268
The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12394 · Cited by 1,183
Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120903408 · Cited by 978
“When images and audiovisual content are easier to understand and process than written text this brings into play “metacognitive experience”: the experientially derived feelings-about-our-thinking that shape our responses to tasks such as processing new information (Schwarz et al., 2007).”
BackgroundFeelings-as-Information Theory
Schwarz, N. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446249215.n15 · Cited by 954
Self-citationDebunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation
Chan, M.-P. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617714579 · Cited by 898
How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought
Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.005 · Cited by 881
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news
Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115 · Cited by 878
Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation
Berinsky, A. J. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123415000186 · Cited by 511
Why don't we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility
Lev‐Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025 · Cited by 672
Social cognition in schizophrenia: an overview
Penn, D. L., Sanna, L. J., & Roberts, D. L. (2007) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn014 · Cited by 574
Self-citationWalter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650219854600 · Cited by 522
Associative processes in intuitive judgment
Morewedge, C. K., & Kahneman, D. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004 · Cited by 492
Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.8.1087 · Cited by 519
Facts and Where to Find Them: Empirical Research on Internet Platforms and Content Moderation
Keller, D., & Leerssen, P. (2020) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.1017/9781108890960
Roese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612454303 · Cited by 457
Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement
Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1295 · Cited by 441
Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716214555474 · Cited by 437
The Financial Education Fallacy
Willis, L. E. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.429 · Cited by 402
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373
Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H. G., Strömbäck, J., Vliegenthart, R., Damstra, A., & Lindgren, E. (2020) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2020.1759443 · Cited by 362
Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.
Swire-Thompson, B., DeGutis, J., & Lazer, D. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.006 · Cited by 360
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Swire‐Thompson, B., & Chang, D. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1 · Cited by 386
Countering antivaccination attitudes
Horne, Z., Powell, D., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1504019112 · Cited by 350
Measuring Processing Fluency: One versus Five Items
Graf, L. K. M., Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1021 · Cited by 349
Consumer decision making and aging: Current knowledge and future directions
Yoon, C., Cole, C. A., & Lee, M. P. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2008.12.002 · Cited by 333
Self-citationThe role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information.
Swire‐Thompson, B., Ecker, U. K. H., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000422 · Cited by 315
Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making
Oyserman, D. (2011) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2011.627187 · Cited by 303
Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda
Guess, A. M., & Lyons, B. A. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.003 · Cited by 284
Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies
Pluviano, S., Watt, C., & Della Sala, S. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181640 · Cited by 273
Rhodes, S. C. (2021) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2021.1910887 · Cited by 311
Communication and Marketing As Climate Change–Intervention Assets
Maibach, E. W., Roser‐Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2008) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.016 · Cited by 259
You’re Having Fun When Time Flies
Sackett, A. M., Meyvis, T., Nelson, L. D., Converse, B. A., & Sackett, A. L. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797609354832 · Cited by 212
Lieberman, E. S., Posner, D., & Tsai, L. L. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.014 · Cited by 205
Making the Truth Stick & the Myths Fade: Lessons from Cognitive Psychology
Schwarz, N., Newman, E., & Leach, W. (2016) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1353/bsp.2016.0009 · Cited by 203
Self-citationEcker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Fenton, O., & Martin, K. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x · Cited by 200
Why the "Death Panel" Myth Wouldn't Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate
Nyhan, B. J. (2010) · The Forum · doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1354 · Cited by 198
Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.6.791 · Cited by 196
Self-citationCombating fake news: an agenda for research and action
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M., Grinberg, N., Friedland, L., Joseph, K., Hobbs, W., & Mattsson, C. E. S. (2017) · Cited by 196
Schwarz, N., Jalbert, M. C., Noah, T., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1067 · Cited by 209
Self-citationWeeks, B. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2014) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edu005 · Cited by 191
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0014678 · Cited by 200
A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News
Batailler, C., Brannon, S. M., Teas, P. E., & Gawronski, B. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620986135 · Cited by 209
Huang, H. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123415000253 · Cited by 189
Garrett, R., Nisbet, E. C., & Lynch, E. K. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12038 · Cited by 180
Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation
Garrett, R. K., & Weeks, B. E. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184733 · Cited by 167
Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced
Matute, H., Blanco, F., Yarritu, I., Díaz‐Lago, M., Vadillo, M. A., & Barberia, I. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888 · Cited by 183
Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments
Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2015) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-095051 · Cited by 163
Straus, M. A. (2010) · Partner Abuse · doi:10.1891/1946-6560.1.3.332 · Cited by 157
The Effectiveness of Social Norms in Fighting Fake News on Social Media
Gimpel, H., Heger, S., Olenberger, C., & Utz, L. (2021) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1870389 · Cited by 167
The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions
Garrett, R., & Weeks, B. E. (2013) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441895 · Cited by 155
Straus, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926770903103081 · Cited by 143
Carey, J. M., Chi, V., Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B. J., & Zeitzoff, T. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw7449 · Cited by 143
Lu, S., Bartol, K. M., Venkataramani, V., Zheng, X., & Liu, X. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0942 · Cited by 149
A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation
Chan, M. S., & Albarracín, D. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8 · Cited by 154
Kliegr, T., Bahník, Š., & Fürnkranz, J. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103458 · Cited by 139
Nisbet, E. C., Hart, P. S., Myers, T., & Ellithorpe, M. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12040 · Cited by 137
Précis ofThe Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Reality
Byrne, R. M. J. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07002579 · Cited by 146
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Apai, J. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.497927 · Cited by 143
Chadwick, A., & Stanyer, J. (2021) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtab019 · Cited by 151
An Examination of Factors Contributing to the Acceptance of Online Health Misinformation
Pan, W., Liu, D., & Fang, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630268 · Cited by 131
Visceral fit: While in a visceral state, associated states of the world seem more likely.
Risen, J. L., & Critcher, C. R. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022460 · Cited by 131
Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster
Västfjäll, D., Peters, E. M., & Slovic, P. (2008) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000176 · Cited by 126
Peter, C., & Koch, T. (2016) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547015613523 · Cited by 124
Siegel, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.005 · Cited by 123
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Chadwick, M. (2020) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00241-6 · Cited by 131
Risk‐Benefit Analysis of Seafood Consumption: A Review
Hellberg, R. S. R., DeWitt, C. A. M., & Morrissey, M. T. (2012) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00200.x · Cited by 117
Chung, M., & Kim, N. (2020) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqaa010 · Cited by 108
When message-frame fits salient cultural-frame, messages feel more persuasive
Üskül, A. K., & Oyserman, D. (2009) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440902759156 · Cited by 107
Creating illusions of knowledge: Learning errors that contradict prior knowledge.
Fazio, L. K., Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., Ornstein, P. A., & Marsh, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0028649 · Cited by 105
Validity judgments of rumors heard multiple times: the shape of the truth effect
DiFonzo, N., Beckstead, J., Stupak, N., & Walders, K. (2016) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2015.1137224 · Cited by 93
Validation and Comprehension of Text Information: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Richter, T. (2015) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2015.1025665 · Cited by 112
“There must be a reason”: Osama, Saddam, and inferred justification
Prasad, M., Perrin, A. J., Bezila, K., Hoffman, S. G., Kindleberger, K., Manturuk, K., & Powers, A. S. (2009) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.2009.00280.x · Cited by 97
Rabinowitz, M., Latella, L. E., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158382 · Cited by 95
The dark side of Eureka: Artificially induced Aha moments make facts feel true
Laukkonen, R., Kaveladze, B. T., Tangen, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104122 · Cited by 93
Misinformation and public opinion of science and health: Approaches, findings, and future directions
Cacciatore, M. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1912437117 · Cited by 109
Cognition is a matter of trust: Distrust tunes cognitive processes
Mayo, R. (2015) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1117249 · Cited by 78
The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return
Butler, A. C., Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0173-y · Cited by 89
Reber, R., & Greifeneder, R. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1258173 · Cited by 87
Greifeneder, R., Jaffé, M. E., Newman, E. J., & Schwarz, N. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429295379 · Cited by 114
Self-citationConsumer skepticism towards CSR messages
Zhang, L., & Hanks, L. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-11-2015-0666 · Cited by 79
Markowitz, E. M., & Guckian, M. L. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813130-5.00003-5 · Cited by 92
Carthy, S. L., Doody, C. B., Cox, K. M., O’Hora, D. P., & Sarma, K. M. (2020) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1106 · Cited by 87
Pedersen, A., & Barlow, F. K. (2008) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00050060802318587 · Cited by 78
Carnahan, D., Bergan, D. E., & Lee, S. (2020) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09591-9 · Cited by 80
Cameron, K. A., Roloff, M. E., Friesema, E. M., Brown, T., Jovanovic, B. D., Hauber, S., & Baker, D. W. (2013) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.017 · Cited by 76
Correction format has a limited role when debunking misinformation
Swire‐Thompson, B., Cook, J., Butler, L. H., Sanderson, J. A., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2021) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gwxe4 · Cited by 83
Mercury advisories and household health trade-offs
Shimshack, J. P., & Ward, M. B. (2010) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.05.001 · Cited by 74
Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017452 · Cited by 74
Gowda, C., Schaffer, S. E., Kopec, K., Markel, A., & Dempsey, A. F. (2013) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.4161/hv.22821 · Cited by 73
Dunning-Kruger Effect: Intuitive Errors Predict Overconfidence on the Cognitive Reflection Test
Coutinho, M. V. C., Thomas, J., Alsuwaidi, A. S. M., & Couchman, J. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603225 · Cited by 77
How effective are your CSR messages? The moderating role of processing fluency and construal level
Zhang, L. (2014) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.04.005 · Cited by 72
Parents’ beliefs in misinformation about vaccines are strengthened by pro-vaccine campaigns
Pluviano, S., Watt, C. A., Ragazzini, G., & Sala, S. D. (2019) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-019-00919-w · Cited by 74
Beatty, T. K. M., Shimshack, J. P., & Volpe, R. (2018) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/703379 · Cited by 68
Wahlheim, C. N., Alexander, T. R., & Peske, C. D. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620952797 · Cited by 67
Democratic Transparency in the Platform Society
Gorwa, R., & Ash, T. G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.013 · Cited by 71
Shin, S. Y., & Lee, J. (2022) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2026797 · Cited by 76
False fame prevented: Avoiding fluency effects without judgmental correction.
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019260 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C.
- Venue
- Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 127-161
- ISSN
- 0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1531042714
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 32.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- metacognition, metacognitive experience, judgment and decision making, bias mitigation, information campaigns, fluency, experiential information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review