Cited by 52Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Volume of discrete brain structures in complex dissociative disorders: preliminary findings

Ehling, T., Nijenhuis, E.R.S., Krikke, A.P.·2007·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

Based on findings in traumatized animals and patients with posttraumatic stress disorder, and on traumatogenic models of complex dissociative disorders, it was hypothesized that (1) patients with complex dissociative disorders have smaller volumes of hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and amygdala than normal controls, (2) these volumes are associated with severity of psychoform and somatoform dissociative symptoms, and (3) patients who recovered from dissociative identity disorder (DID) have more hippocampal volume that patients with florid DID. The preliminary findings of the study are supportive of these hypotheses. Psychotherapy for dissociative disorders may affect hippocampal volume, but longitudinal studies are required to document this potential causal relationship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6123(07)67029-0

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In DID, reduced volumes in amygdala and hippocampus and parahippocampus were found, although discrepant findings of normal amygdala and hippocampal volumes compared to healthy controls were also reported.

    “In DID, reduced volumes in the amygdala and hippocampus [94, 95] and parahippocampus [95] were found, although discrepant findings of normal amygdala and hippocampal volumes compared to healthy controls were also reported [96].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehling, T., Nijenhuis, E. R. S., & Krikke, A. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • GGZ Drenthe (NL)
Corresponding author
Ehling, T.
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2007
Volume
167
Pages
307-310
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1570933085
Cited by
52
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.99
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
dissociative identity disorder, hippocampal volume, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala volume, brain structure volume, dissociative symptoms, trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Brain, Dissociative Disorders, Hippocampus, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Somatoform Disorders, Parahippocampal Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review