Cited by 48Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Reinforcing and subjective effects of methylphenidate in adults with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Open access
Kollins, Scott H., English, Joseph, Robinson, Rachel, Hallyburton, Matt, Chrisman, Allan K.·2009·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale There has been controversy over the abuse potential of methylphenidate (MPH) in the context of treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Objective The objective of this study was to compare the reinforcing and subjective effects of oral MPH in adults with and without ADHD.Materials and methods Following screening, 33 adults (n = 16 with ADHD; n = 17 free from psychiatric diagnoses) completed four pairs of experimental sessions, each of which included a sampling session and a self-administration session. During sampling sessions, subjects received in randomized order 0 (placebo), 20, 40, and 60 mg MPH. During self-administration sessions, subjects completed a progressive ratio (PR) task to earn portions of the dose received on the corresponding sampling session. Subjective effects were recorded throughout all sessions. The main outcome measure for the study was the number of ratios completed on the PR task. Secondary measures included peak subjective effects and area-under-the-curve values for subjective effects.Results Compared to the control group, the ADHD group completed more ratios on the PR task. Both groups showed robust effects of methylphenidate on subjective endpoints. Main effects of group were noted on subjective effects involving concentration and arousal.Conclusions Compared to placebo, MPH produced reinforcing effects only for the ADHD group and not for the control group. Increases in stimulant-related subjective effects in non-ADHD subjects were not associated with drug reinforcement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-008-1439-6

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from preclinical research have suggested that animals exposed to stimulants become sensitized: subsequent administration results in more robust behavioural responses, and/or they become more likely to self-administer drugs of abuse later in development.

    “Findings from preclinical research have suggested that animals exposed to stimulants become “sensitized”: subsequent administration results in more robust behavioural responses, and/or they become more likely to self-administer drugs of abuse later in development [72, 73].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kollins, S. H., English, J., Robinson, R., Hallyburton, M., & Chrisman, A. K.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kollins, Scott H.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2008-12-23
Volume
204
Issue
1
Pages
73-83
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2028338983
Cited by
48
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017196, K24DA023464)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, drug reinforcement, self-administration, abuse liability, subjective effects, stimulants, adults, concentration, arousal, progressive ratio task
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Choice Behavior, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reinforcement, Psychology, Self Administration, Area Under Curve, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review