Cited by 129Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentMotor Control and Adaptation

Development of Postural Responses During Standing in Healthy Children and Children with Spastic Diplegia

Woollacott, M.H, Burtner, P, Jensen, J, Jasiewicz, J, Roncesvalles, N, Sveistrup, H·1998·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Studies on the development of balance control show a clear developmental progression of the emergence of organized muscle response patterns, with tonic background muscle activity decreasing and phasic bursts of activity emerging in all three agonist muscles in a synergic group (gastrocnemius-hamstrings-trunk extensors or tibialis anterior-quadriceps-abdominals) just prior to the onset of independent stance. The rudimentary ability to adapt postural responses to changing task conditions is present in children as young as 1 year of age. Older children with spastic diplegia have muscle activation patterns typically seen in normal children who are at the pull-to-stand stage of development, including poorly organized (proximal activated before distal muscles) responses with a high degree of antagonist co-activation. When normal children were asked to stand in a crouched posture like the CP children, the additional constraint caused muscle response patterns to resemble those of CP children, suggesting that differences in balance control in CP children are due to both CNS deficits and biomechanical changes in postural alignment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00048-1

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with CP show deficits in anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural adjustments, and sensory and musculoskeletal components of postural control compared with children with typical development.

    “To date, it is known that children with CP show deficits in anticipatory postural adjustments, 4 -9 and reactive postural adjustments, 10 -12 as well as sensory 4,13 and musculoskeletal components 14,15 of postural control, compared with children with typical development.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woollacott, M. H., Burtner, P., Jensen, J., Jasiewicz, J., Roncesvalles, N., & Sveistrup, H.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Woollacott, M.H
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-03
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
583-589
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1579010898
Cited by
128
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Centre for Health Research; Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
spastic diplegia, cerebral palsy, postural control, balance control, muscle activation patterns, tonic muscle activity, antagonist coactivation, postural alignment, children, developmental progression
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Humans, Muscle Spasticity, Paralysis, Posture, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review