CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 304Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisGlaucoma and retinal disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Racial differences in the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration

Open access
Friedman, David S, Katz, Joanne, Bressler, Neil M, Rahmani, Bahram, Tielsch, James M·1999·Ophthalmology
DOI 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90267-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and its fundus manifestations in a population-based sample of older black and white Americans. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based study of 2520 participants of whom 1854 are white and 666 are black. Mean age was 73.5 years. Stereoscopic color fundus photographs were graded for presence, severity, and location of drusen, retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities, and choroidal neovascularization or disciform scarring. RESULTS: Drusen at least 64 microm in size were identified in 56% of black and white individuals within 3000 microm of the foveal center, but drusen larger than 125 microm were more common among white participants (16% white vs 11% black individuals). Drusen at least 250 microm in size, confluent drusen, or a larger area (> 10%) occupied by drusen were each more common among white participants. White individuals were 3 times more likely to have focal hyperpigmentation than black individuals. Racial differences were most pronounced for features within the central 1500-microm macular zone. Neovascular AMD was present in 1.7% of white participants and 1.1% of black participants (age-adjusted, P = .38), whereas geographic atrophy was more common in white than black individuals (1.8% vs 0.3%; age-adjusted, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: White persons are generally more likely than black persons to have medium or large drusen, focal pigment abnormalities, and advanced AMD. Racial differences were prominent for nonneovascular AMD features only when present in the central zone. These data suggest that black individuals may have a mechanism for protection in the central zone against these critical fundus features, which themselves convey high risk of progression to advanced AMD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90267-1

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 304

Related

Metadata

Authors
Friedman, D. S., Katz, J., Bressler, N. M., Rahmani, B., & Tielsch, J. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Friedman, David S
ORCID
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
106
Issue
6
Pages
1049-1055
ISSN
  • 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-6420
DOI
10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90267-1
OpenAlex
W2006572461
Cited by
304
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey003605-10, 5r01ey005091-05, 5k08ey000358-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG16294, R01AG016294)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, racial differences, Black and White Americans, drusen, retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities, choroidal neovascularization, geographic atrophy, fundus photography, prevalence, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fundus Oculi, Health Surveys, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Photography, Risk Factors, Baltimore, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review