CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,799Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityGlobal trade and economicsEconomic Growth and Productivity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings

Acemoglu, Daron, Autor, David·2011·Handbook of Labor Economics
DOI 10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Acemoglu, 2002, Technology and the labor market, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 7, 10.1257/0022051026976 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Costinot, Arnaud, Vogel, Jonathan, Matching and Inequality in the World Economy. Journal of Political Economy (forthcoming).
  3. Ikenaga, 2009, Polarization of the Japanese labor market–adoption of ICT and changes in tasks required, Japanese Journal of Labour Studies, 584, 73
  4. Jensen, J. Bradford, Kletzer, Lori, Measuring tradable services and the task content of offshorable services jobs. In: Katharine Abraham, Mike Harper, James Spletzer (Eds.), Labor in the NewEconomy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (forthcoming).
  5. Pierce, Brooks, 2001. Compensation inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 1493–1525.Pierce, Brooks, Recent trends in compensation inequality. In: Katharine Abraham, Mike Harper, JamesSpletzer (Eds.), Labor in the New Economy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago forthcoming). · DOI
  6. Rosen, 1981, The economics of superstars, American Economic Review, 71, 845
  7. Saint-Paul, 2001, On the distribution of income and workers under intrafirm spillovers with an application to ideas and networks, Journal of Political Economy, 109, 1, 10.1086/318604 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,799

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
ORCID
Autor, David
Venue
Handbook of Labor Economics
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2011
Pages
1043-1171
ISSN
1573-4463 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5
OpenAlex
W3124124240
Cited by
3,799
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 371 · 2025: 432 · 2024: 462 · 2023: 401 · 2022: 391 · 2021: 368 · 2020: 289 · 2019: 228 · 2018: 242 · 2017: 168 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 53
FWCI
303.39
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Handbook of labour economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
Keywords
returns to skills, wage inequality, skill-biased technological change, job polarization, offshoring, task-based model, skill substitution, wage distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review