Cited by 1,727Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityMigration and Labor DynamicsNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market*

Deming, David J.·2017·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

The labor market increasingly rewards social skills. Between 1980 and 2012, jobs requiring high levels of social interaction grew by nearly 12 percentage points as a share of the U.S. labor force. Math-intensive but less social jobs—including many STEM occupations—shrank by 3.3 percentage points over the same period. Employment and wage growth were particularly strong for jobs requiring high levels of both math skill and social skills. To understand these patterns, I develop a model of team production where workers “trade tasks” to exploit their comparative advantage. In the model, social skills reduce coordination costs, allowing workers to specialize and work together more efficiently. The model generates predictions about sorting and the relative returns to skill across occupations, which I investigate using data from the NLSY79 and the NLSY97. Using a comparable set of skill measures and covariates across survey waves, I find that the labor market return to social skills was much greater in the 2000s than in the mid-1980s and 1990s.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qje/qjx022

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deming (2017) and Edin et al. (2022) document an increase in the economic returns to social and non-cognitive skills in the United States and Sweden in recent decades.

    “Deming (2017) and Edin et al. (2022) document an increase in the economic returns to social and non-cognitive skills in the United States and Sweden in recent decades.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Deming (2017)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deming, D. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Deming, David J.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2017-06-06
Volume
132
Issue
4
Pages
1593-1640
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W1884571572
Cited by
1,727
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 183 · 2025: 234 · 2024: 205 · 2023: 225 · 2022: 242 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
205.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
social skills, social interaction, team production, coordination costs, occupational sorting, returns to skills, STEM careers, mathematical skills, skill complementarity, wage growth, job creation, skill-biased technological change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review