Cited by 57Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingStress Responses and CortisolPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Optimism effects on cellular immunity: testing the affective and persistence models

Segerstrom, Suzanne C, Castañeda, Jay O, Spencer, Theresa E·2003·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00384-7

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Segerstrom, S. C., Castañeda, J. O., & Spencer, T. E.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Segerstrom, Suzanne C
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1615-1624
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056543656
Cited by
57
References
40
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
optimism, cell-mediated immunity, delayed-type hypersensitivity, affective model, persistence model, academic stress, conscientiousness, Big Five personality traits, coping, professional students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review