Cited by 217Personality Traits and PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Latent Structure and Relationships With Dimensions of Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in a Large Clinical Sample

Open access
Rosellini, Anthony J., Brown, Timothy A.·2011·Assessment

Abstract

The present study evaluated the latent structure of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI) and relations between the five-factor model (FFM) of personality and dimensions of DSM-IV anxiety and depressive disorders (panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder [GAD], obsessive—compulsive disorder, social phobia [SOC], major depressive disorder [MDD]) in a large sample of outpatients ( N = 1,980). Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) was used to show that a five-factor solution provided acceptable model fit, albeit with some poorly functioning items. Neuroticism demonstrated significant positive associations with all but one of the disorder constructs whereas Extraversion was inversely related to SOC and MDD. Conscientiousness was inversely related to MDD but demonstrated a positive relationship with GAD. Results are discussed in regard to potential revisions to the NEO FFI, the evaluation of other NEO instruments using ESEM, and clinical implications of structural paths between FFM domains and specific emotional disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191110382848

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with generalized anxiety tend to present with higher than average levels of conscientiousness.

    “Patients with generalized anxiety tend to present with higher than average levels of conscientiousness 143 , another Big Five personality trait.”

    From The clinical characterization of the adult patient with an anxiety or related disorder aimed at personalization of management (2021) · cites this paper as [143]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports a positive association between conscientiousness and GAD dimensions only after controlling for other personality and disorder dimensions. It also reports a trivial unadjusted correlation (r = −.02), so the finding does not establish that patients with GAD have higher-than-average conscientiousness. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Di Nardo PA Brown TA Barlow DH 1994 Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime version (ADIS-IV-L) New York, NY Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosellini, A. J., & Brown, T. A.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Rosellini, Anthony J.
Venue
Assessment
Published
2010-09-29
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
27-38
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2090284311
Cited by
217
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH039096, R01MH039096)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
NEO-FFI, five-factor model of personality, latent structure, exploratory structural equation modeling, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, neuroticism, extraversion, conscientiousness, personality and psychopathology, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Models, Theoretical, Psychological Theory, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological, Likelihood Functions, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review